--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" <wayback71@...> wrote: (snip) > Ann, it is not that I don't read or question. I have different > opinions about some things and some people than you do. And that > is fine for us all. Judy and her way of interacting with people > seems to be one of the differences between us. In the only 2 > posts of hers I saw a few minutes ago (not read, just saw the > opening lines today and quickly skipped them as angry garbage) > she called me "Stoopid"
This is Susan's way of avoiding the bad news: that she congratulated Barry on having made what turned out to be a massive *factual* error on which he based the knowingly false accusation that *I* was a hypocrite. But, as I said, you're stuck with having supported Barry's willful attempt at deception whether you acknowledge it or not. I wasn't "angry," I was laughing at you. > and someone else a "prick." Really great style of > interacting, huh? Sorry if it offends your delicate ears, Susan, but STOOOOOOOOPID is a pretty mild characterization of your blooper; and Seraphita was being a prick in her pro-Zimmerman triumphalism. Plus which, it doesn't even come close to the viciousness of Barry's "style of interacting." Talk about double standards! > I guess I could turn tables and ask you, do you ever look at > what Judy writes and check if it is true? As one of her loyal > friends, surely you must know that she stretches the bounds of > what is real and true. Really? Got any evidence for that, Susan? Didn't think so.
