--- In [email protected], Bhairitu <noozguru@...> wrote:
>
> On 07/22/2013 01:48 PM, authfriend wrote:
> > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote:
> >> --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote:
> >>> The Duchess of Cambridge has given birth to the future
> >>> King of England. His name will be announced soon.
> >> The baby was born at 4:24 pm London time (11:24 am Eastern
> >> Daylight time), weighing 8 pounds, 6 ounces.
> > Or it may have been 12:24 pm Eastern Daylight time--I'm
> > getting different times from different Web time-zone
> > converters. All the news reports say "4:24 pm local time,"
> > FWIW, which should be BST, British Summer Time.
> 
> You want the BST since the UK is GMT but goes BST for
> summer.  It's one hour ahead of UTC

That's what I figured, but I got two different times 
depending on the site. All the sites I tried noted that
both locations, NYC and London, were on Daylight Saving/
Summer time, so they were presumably taking that into
account; but one of the sites (the first one I used)
gave me 11:24 am EDT for the time of birth in NYC, the
others gave me 12:24 pm EDT. How could it be 12:24 if
the cities are five hours apart, both times are Daylight
Saving/Summer time, and the kid was born at 4:24 local
time?

Never mind! The baby's born, he and the mother are in
good shape, and I'm not concerned about his horoscope.





 which is what is used
> for planetary calculations and the same year round.  Time zones are the bane 
> of astrologers.  In the 
> Internet age we could do away with them altogether and just use UTC.  It 
> would make things much easier when communicating with people in other 
> parts of the world.
>


Reply via email to