Hey, I never get involved in the Barry/Judy fued, too much like little brother/sister arguements. However,I found *Dark Triad* post amusing, people getting all defensive about it. "He's talking about me, I better nip that in the bud"! LOL people, Barry really pushed some buttons on this one.
________________________________ From: authfriend <authfri...@yahoo.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2013 5:40 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: "Night of the Dark Triad" --- In mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> wrote: > > I hope you are not talking about me Barry baby 'cause I > have been known to get really malevolent and shit on > people who lie. He doesn't seem to be talking about anybody on FFL, as it happens. I strongly suspect it's not anything he's observed anywhere else on the Internet either. He just found the article he linked to and figured he could use it to dump on his "enemies" on FFL. The article is hilarious, by the way. Also see this one (from the same newspaper): http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/9951649/Night-owls-are-wealthier-and-wiser-than-larks-study-finds.html http://tinyurl.com/dxcx27l I don't think the Telegraph has won any awards for excellence in science journalism recently. ;-) > > How's that little girl Maya - any latest movies that you have watched > together? > > I have always wanted a baby girl Barry baby - never too late, I'm still > very hopeful. > > Oh such a coincidence, actually working late on system patching today :-) > > > > > On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 12:35 AM, turquoiseb > <mailto:no_reply%40yahoogroups.com>wrote: > > > ** > > > > > > No, my subject line is not the name of a horror movie that > > only bhairitu could like. :-) It's a synopsis of some > > research, written up in the article at the link below, > > that seems to reinforce one of my observations about FFL, > > and behavior on the Internet in general. > > > > That is, that those posters who have a long-term, *consis- > > tent* tendency to stay up WAY late at night (for "scientific > > purposes" I'll define 'WAY late' not as 'slightly after the > > TM angel train has departed at 10:00 pm' but 'the hours > > after midnight, especially in the 1:00-3:00 am range') > > tend also to make the nastiest, most attack-ridden, and > > narcissistically-impaired posts. > > > > Not to "name names" or anything, but generic individuals > > who strongly resemble, say, former minor cult leaders, > > stay-at-home-correctors-of-other-people's-writing, > > programmers with a history of mental instability, and > > the recently retired often do this. :-) > > > > Whereas others (such as...uh...moi) almost never post after > > midnight any more, unless I've awakened and am waiting for > > my hot chocolate to take effect so I can get back to sleep, > > or have just come in from some rare hot night out. > > > > Anyway, it's just a trend that I get to notice, living where > > I do, because when I wake up in the mornings (7:00 am or so), > > some of these "night owls" are still posting from the US, and > > often continue to do so for several hours, or in the case of > > a couple of West Coasters, until noon my time or later. > > > > And I've tended to notice (in my subjective opinion, of > > course, which is nothing *but* opinion) that the later it > > gets their time, the nastier and more malevolent their > > posts tend to get. I always wondered about that. Now, > > reading this article, I see that some psychologists > > have wondered about it, too. > > > > > > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/10204896/Night-owls-more-likely-to-have-Dark-Triad-of-personality-traits.html > > > > > > >
