Xeno, I still don't understand why people want to limit the number of posts. If a person doesn't like a lot of posts, can't they simply not read some? Maybe it's different for Message View in that one is forced to read them all? What is it? Otherwise limiting the number of posts seems like suppression to me.
________________________________ From: Xenophaneros Anartaxius <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2013 6:23 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count Thu 01-Aug-13 00:15:05 UTC --- In [email protected], "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@...> wrote: > > No I'll get it. Turqb is a newbie here. If we need to litigate it we'll > take it to the Shankaracharya to decide. I got seniority. You all better git > ready for the new 30-post limit then and much more strict enforcement of the > FFL anti-blasphemy guidelines. > Sincerely, -Buck I would not mind a 30 post limit, but having a religious, Islamic-like caliphate overseeing content would have me being the first in the trenches to take you out. Blasphemy is a refuge for the power hungry who have a weak argument for their wares. If you have to prop up your ideas by supressing others in a discussion forum you do not have a worthwhile argument.
