--- In [email protected], "Ann" <awoelflebater@...> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Michael Jackson <mjackson74@> wrote: > > > > > > So Buck do you consider everyone who ever learned the sidhis to still be > > > a sidha or governor even if they don't do them and don't do TM? > > > > > > > > > > Dear MJ; > > Well, we are identified by the things we do. Yur a meditator or yur not in > > this case. Yur a 'practicing' sidha or yur not. Likewise a Governor. In > > our case here, Yur a practitioner or yur a quitter. Of course people will > > split hairs many more ways. It sounds like Feste is a non-meditator > > quitter as in once learned meditation and just does not do it. Like if I > > remember right you are a meditator, as in learned to meditate and you > > meditate now. It is the only reason I bother to read yur posts here. What > > could non-meditators have to say that has worthwhile perspective? That > > someone could learn meditation and throw it away is tragedy beyond reason. > > I'm a practical guy, no philosopher,I meditate and I use Patanjali all the > > time too, a sidha too. > > I got to git to morning meditation at the Dome right now. > > Jai Brahmananda Saraswati, > > -Buck > > I personally don't think quitters and non meditators deserve to live. Not > only are they not worth reading or listening to but they must be stupid, > sub-human or at least very, very bad influences on the world. I say, "Lynch > them all" and the sooner the better.
Why are you dragging David into the conversation, and what do you mean by using his name as a verb? L
