Wow - I never actually considered that, but it is a cool thing to think about. I meant that it is through thought, and thinking, that the ability to communicate becomes possible, through the development and refinement of communications technology.
--- In [email protected], "John" <jr_esq@...> wrote: > > Dr. D, > > You appear to be saying that the technology of communication is a necessity > to have a true culture. Is that correct? > > --- In [email protected], doctordumbass@ <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > David needs to speak for himself. There is not necessarily a "we", in his > > comment. > > > > Thought is the *only* reason Mr. Frawley, and you, John, are able to share > > this piece of spinach with us. The engineers that developed this technology > > of communication, needed to think deeply, and continuously, to put this > > together. > > > > If I may hazard a guess, David F. has just discovered that 90% of his > > thoughts are useless energy and momentum, spent maintaining a story. It is > > a common, though by no means, universal malady. > > > > Once he sees this, perhaps Dave can put his mind into silence, and simply > > recognize the Divine utility of thought - the other 10%. In the meantime, > > his projecting isn't helping. > > > > --- In [email protected], "John" <jr_esq@> wrote: > > > > > > "Thought, if we learn to observe it, is a reaction-mechanism devoid of > > > true consciousness. It is the inertia of our conditioning that we fail > > > to truly question." > > > > > > David Frawley > > > > > >
