--- In [email protected], "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@...> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "John" <jr_esq@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], doctordumbass@ <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > Wow - I never actually considered that, but it is a cool thing to think > > > about. I meant that it is through thought, and thinking, that the ability > > > to communicate becomes possible, through the development and refinement > > > of communications technology. > > > > Dr. D, > > > > Granted, what you say is true. But the development and refinement of > > communications technology does not necessarily lead to an unconditioned > > mind or thought. It can only contribute to the inertia of our conditioning. > > > > Yes, hence the instigation of the 50-post limit on FFL. > -Buck
There you go, Buck. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "John" <jr_esq@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dr. D, > > > > > > > > You appear to be saying that the technology of communication is a > > > > necessity to have a true culture. Is that correct? > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], doctordumbass@ <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > David needs to speak for himself. There is not necessarily a "we", in > > > > > his comment. > > > > > > > > > > Thought is the *only* reason Mr. Frawley, and you, John, are able to > > > > > share this piece of spinach with us. The engineers that developed > > > > > this technology of communication, needed to think deeply, and > > > > > continuously, to put this together. > > > > > > > > > > If I may hazard a guess, David F. has just discovered that 90% of his > > > > > thoughts are useless energy and momentum, spent maintaining a story. > > > > > It is a common, though by no means, universal malady. > > > > > > > > > > Once he sees this, perhaps Dave can put his mind into silence, and > > > > > simply recognize the Divine utility of thought - the other 10%. In > > > > > the meantime, his projecting isn't helping. > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "John" <jr_esq@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > "Thought, if we learn to observe it, is a reaction-mechanism devoid > > > > > > of true consciousness. It is the inertia of our conditioning that > > > > > > we fail to truly question." > > > > > > > > > > > > David Frawley > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
