Yeah right, typical FFL ad hominem 'kill the messenger' kind of attack. -Buck in the Dome
--- In [email protected], Michael Jackson <mjackson74@...> wrote: > > Buck, I can only conclude that your years of High Dome numbers obsession or > perhaps mucking out all those cow and horse stalls have driven you around the > bend. > > I have no idea of Feste's real name, location or how much more intelligent > Feste is than Buck is (sorry, just couldn't resist that one - > If Feste thinks I said or did something improper where he is concerned, I > will apologize publicly to Feste, who I am sure feels all warm and fuzzy that > you are defending Feste's honor. > > > > ________________________________ > From: Buck > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 8:14 AM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex's Birthday Present - Posting Limit > > > > Â > > > --- In [email protected], "seventhray27" <steve.sundur@> wrote: > > > > > > Let's see if Buck has the integrity to back up his claim. Talk about a > > serious offense: making an accusation against someone that you > > won't/can't back up. Buck has never been one to engage in much of a > > back and forth dialog. He's pretty much a drive by poster. > > > > Son, Read MJ's recent post about Feste. Feste has scrupulously guarded > his/her identity here for years to protect him/her and then MJ bla-blahs on > about personal things about Feste. Loose lips sink ships in this community. > People live here with a lot of fear for their relationship with larger things > around the TM movement like employment, housing, access, grants, even Dome > badges. You might not care but to some people their anonymity in posting is > important. Blabbing on about someone like MJ did with Feste, that's a sin > against the FFL guidelines of the first degree. A strong hand of rebuke is > in order. > -Buck in the Dome > > > I'm going to try to figure out how to get those pictures to show up. > > Not sure what the problem is. > > > > There rightly are propriety rules about pornography on this list. > > > I'll try the image sharing site Alex recommended. > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Michael Jackson wrote: > > > > > > Umm, if you wouldn't mind telling me who or what I did wrong according > > to you - I don't recall revealing personal information about anyone. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: Buck dhamiltony2k5@ > > > To: [email protected] > > > Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 9:48 PM > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex's Birthday Present - Posting Limit > > > > > > > > > > > > Ã > > > > > > Were I king of FFL I'd make some changes around here. Like did you see > > MJ earlier today revealing some personal information about an anonymous > > FFL poster here. Were I King, MJ would be out of here on his ear for > > serious felony against the guidelines. That guy has fouled and had way > > more than three strikes here. I'd clean up the roster real quick. -Buck > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "feste37" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I have some seniority too, since post #67, September 28, 2001, is > > mine (under a different handle). I've been here ever since. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No it should go to a mediator meditator. It is time for: > > > > !Return of Anti-Blasphemy Law and Order! It's time is nigh. It will > > be a dawn of a New FFL Life, an age of Enlightenment on FFL. In that new > > day on FFL all will be meditators and the wolf and the lamb will live > > together; the leopard will lie down with the baby goat. The calf and the > > yearling will be safe with the lion, and a little child [Buck] will lead > > them all. > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Alex Stanley" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], nablusoss1008 wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is what we can expect X 10, perhaps even more now with > > the "generous" gift from Rick to Alex. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If Alex doesn't like it, why not let Buck do the moderating ? > > :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, in terms of people still here who posted early on, Dick > > Mays has top seniority at post #5, followed closely by Buck at #6. > > Buck's been chomping at the bit to whip this place into accord with > > Natural Law, so why not put him in charge of the whole thing? To put it > > another way, what would Maharishi do? Maharishi would chose Buck. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
