Son, the judge just threw out your case for lack of evidence. Now when you slander someone, which could easily be argued that this is what you did - that would be a serious accusation.
I thought regular practice developed a better sense of discrimination. You know appreciating the mantra at finer and finer levels. --- In [email protected], "Buck" wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "seventhray27" steve.sundur@ wrote: > > > > > > Let's see if Buck has the integrity to back up his claim. Talk about a > > serious offense: making an accusation against someone that you > > won't/can't back up. Buck has never been one to engage in much of a > > back and forth dialog. He's pretty much a drive by poster. > > > > Son, Read MJ's recent post about Feste. Feste has scrupulously guarded his/her identity here for years to protect him/her and then MJ bla-blahs on about personal things about Feste. Loose lips sink ships in this community. People live here with a lot of fear for their relationship with larger things around the TM movement like employment, housing, access, grants, even Dome badges. You might not care but to some people their anonymity in posting is important. Blabbing on about someone like MJ did with Feste, that's a sin against the FFL guidelines of the first degree. A strong hand of rebuke is in order. > -Buck in the Dome > > > > I'm going to try to figure out how to get those pictures to show up. > > Not sure what the problem is. > > > > There rightly are propriety rules about pornography on this list. > > > > I'll try the image sharing site Alex recommended. > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Michael Jackson wrote: > > > > > > Umm, if you wouldn't mind telling me who or what I did wrong according > > to you - I don't recall revealing personal information about anyone. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: Buck dhamiltony2k5@ > > > To: [email protected] > > > Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 9:48 PM > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex's Birthday Present - Posting Limit > > > > > > > > > > > > Â > > > > > > Were I king of FFL I'd make some changes around here. Like did you see > > MJ earlier today revealing some personal information about an anonymous > > FFL poster here. Were I King, MJ would be out of here on his ear for > > serious felony against the guidelines. That guy has fouled and had way > > more than three strikes here. I'd clean up the roster real quick. -Buck > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "feste37" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I have some seniority too, since post #67, September 28, 2001, is > > mine (under a different handle). I've been here ever since. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No it should go to a mediator meditator. It is time for: > > > > !Return of Anti-Blasphemy Law and Order! It's time is nigh. It will > > be a dawn of a New FFL Life, an age of Enlightenment on FFL. In that new > > day on FFL all will be meditators and the wolf and the lamb will live > > together; the leopard will lie down with the baby goat. The calf and the > > yearling will be safe with the lion, and a little child [Buck] will lead > > them all. > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Alex Stanley" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], nablusoss1008 wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is what we can expect X 10, perhaps even more now with > > the "generous" gift from Rick to Alex. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If Alex doesn't like it, why not let Buck do the moderating ? > > :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, in terms of people still here who posted early on, Dick > > Mays has top seniority at post #5, followed closely by Buck at #6. > > Buck's been chomping at the bit to whip this place into accord with > > Natural Law, so why not put him in charge of the whole thing? To put it > > another way, what would Maharishi do? Maharishi would chose Buck. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
