Umm, if you wouldn't mind telling me who or what I did wrong according to you - I don't recall revealing personal information about anyone.
________________________________ From: Buck <dhamiltony...@yahoo.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 9:48 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex's Birthday Present - Posting Limit Were I king of FFL I'd make some changes around here. Like did you see MJ earlier today revealing some personal information about an anonymous FFL poster here. Were I King, MJ would be out of here on his ear for serious felony against the guidelines. That guy has fouled and had way more than three strikes here. I'd clean up the roster real quick. -Buck > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <feste37@> wrote: > > > > I have some seniority too, since post #67, September 28, 2001, is mine > > (under a different handle). I've been here ever since. > > > > > > No it should go to a mediator meditator. It is time for: > !Return of Anti-Blasphemy Law and Order! It's time is nigh. It will be a > dawn of a New FFL Life, an age of Enlightenment on FFL. In that new day on > FFL all will be meditators and the wolf and the lamb will live together; the > leopard will lie down with the baby goat. The calf and the yearling will be > safe with the lion, and a little child [Buck] will lead them all. > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" <j_alexander_stanley@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is what we can expect X 10, perhaps even more now with the > > > > "generous" gift from Rick to Alex. > > > > > > > > If Alex doesn't like it, why not let Buck do the moderating ? :-) > > > > > > > > > > Well, in terms of people still here who posted early on, Dick Mays has > > > top seniority at post #5, followed closely by Buck at #6. Buck's been > > > chomping at the bit to whip this place into accord with Natural Law, so > > > why not put him in charge of the whole thing? To put it another way, what > > > would Maharishi do? Maharishi would chose Buck. > > > > > >
