Oh my lord! That means you can't abide that English woman, Jo Rowling!!!!!
________________________________ From: salyavin808 <fintlewoodle...@mail.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 11:41 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chopra nothing without Maharishi --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson <mjackson74@...> wrote: > > Awww, Come on Sal, why you don't like Deepak? I don't like any of these guru types who make a fortune out of seekers, even if it is their own choice. I don't like the reliance on quantum physics as a prop for woolly thinking and undeliverable promises or pushing untested folk medicine. I don't like the whole "veda is truth" thing. Basically my same reasons for disliking the TMO. I am interested in his split from the TMO though, in our old tape cupboard at the academy we had a huge box of videos featuring Deepak with a "not to be played" sign on them. I gather he went from quite the darling to public enemy number one very swiftly but I never managed to get a straight answer about why from anybody. Usually it was that he changed Marshy's teaching (I thought it was him teaching Marshy about AV) or that he made some personal money out of it which TM bigwigs saw as some sort of ultimate crime. Bizarrely, as they still sell no end of courses in vedic #wisdom promising a fruitful career. Maybe they were annoyed as he was the only one who ever did make a buck out of the TMO. I know precious few who ever got any "nature" support from that direction. > > I know I have enjoyed his writing - especially his first fiction novel, > Return of Merlin which he supposedly wrote the bulk of during the year when > he was looking after the Big M subsequent to his being poisoned. I loved that > novel. Didn't know he wrote fiction though, but I never liked fantasy novels anyway, if I even get a sniff of a wizard I'm off - It's sci-fi for me if I'm feeling speculative. ________________________________ > From: salyavin808 <fintlewoodlewix@...> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 2:22 AM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chopra nothing without Maharishi > > > > Â > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Seraphita" <s3raphita@> wrote: > > > If you're interested in the debate with materialists, you > > could do a lot better than Chopra. He's not what I would > > call a rigorous thinker. > > He's an asshole. > > > You might try Thomas Nagel's "Mind and Cosmos: Why the > > Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost > > Certainly False." > > > > Nagel got in a lot of trouble with the big-time materialists; > > the book really upset them, so he must have hit close to the > > bone. > > LOL. >