Interesting the question M answers at the end - A TM teacher says that with TM 
there is no Guru (master) - Chela (disciple) relationship.
 
M responds that it is more like a history professor, a purely instructional 
relationship with the student, "otherwise the whole complication would be 
unscientific - LOL". Good stuff.  

--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <LEnglish5@...> wrote:
>
> It might be the case. I always thought MMY was pretty good at stringing 
> sentences together, at least in short bursts:
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRSvW9Ml9DQ
> 
> L
> 
> --- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <LEnglish5@> wrote:
> > >
> > > http://www.wisdomofchopra.com/
> > > 
> > > You'll think a simplistic AI is totally enlightened...
> > > 
> > > ...or something.
> > > 
> > > [Apparently fooled Chopra]
> > 
> > What makes you think that Maharishi was doing anything
> > other than this same parroted pattern-matching?
> > 
> > This is *exactly* the kind of thing I was referring to
> > earlier as "spiritual teacher schtick" and that Curtis
> > referred to as a "language form." 
> > 
> > And Maharishi was *just* as likely to use it as Chopra.
> > 
> > [ Apparently that fooled you, and many others ]
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > > --- In [email protected], srijau@ <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Chopra has made it very clear he would be nothing 
> > > > without Maharishi, there would certainly have been 
> > > > no primordial sound meditation. 
> > > > At least he is honest about it unlike certain others.
> > > > 
> > > > http://www.huffingtonpost.com/deepak-chopra/the-maharishi-years-the-u_b_86412.html
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to