Interesting the question M answers at the end - A TM teacher says that with TM there is no Guru (master) - Chela (disciple) relationship. M responds that it is more like a history professor, a purely instructional relationship with the student, "otherwise the whole complication would be unscientific - LOL". Good stuff.
--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <LEnglish5@...> wrote: > > It might be the case. I always thought MMY was pretty good at stringing > sentences together, at least in short bursts: > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRSvW9Ml9DQ > > L > > --- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <LEnglish5@> wrote: > > > > > > http://www.wisdomofchopra.com/ > > > > > > You'll think a simplistic AI is totally enlightened... > > > > > > ...or something. > > > > > > [Apparently fooled Chopra] > > > > What makes you think that Maharishi was doing anything > > other than this same parroted pattern-matching? > > > > This is *exactly* the kind of thing I was referring to > > earlier as "spiritual teacher schtick" and that Curtis > > referred to as a "language form." > > > > And Maharishi was *just* as likely to use it as Chopra. > > > > [ Apparently that fooled you, and many others ] > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], srijau@ <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Chopra has made it very clear he would be nothing > > > > without Maharishi, there would certainly have been > > > > no primordial sound meditation. > > > > At least he is honest about it unlike certain others. > > > > > > > > http://www.huffingtonpost.com/deepak-chopra/the-maharishi-years-the-u_b_86412.html > > > > > > > > > >
