On 08/27/2013 02:27 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com>, Bhairitu <noozguru@...> wrote:
>
> On 08/27/2013 09:53 AM, authfriend wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com>
> > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com>, Bhairitu <noozguru@> wrote:
> > >
> > > (Reuters) - Americans strongly oppose U.S. intervention in
> > > Syria's civil war and believe Washington should stay out
> > > of the conflict even if reports that Syria's government
> > > used deadly chemicals to attack civilians are confirmed,
> > > a Reuters/Ipsos poll says.
> >
> > Um, non sequitur with regard to my exchange with Share.
>
> Not really. Share talked about polling. The article was about
> polls taken. A bit confused today?
No, that would be you, actually. More confused even than
Share, perhaps. Do you believe all polls ask the same
question? Do you know what question Share's hypothetical
poll would have asked? Is it the same question your poll
asked? Do you think it would have made any sense to take
the poll she imagined? Would it have asked the same
question as what was puzzling DrD? Was DrD really even
asking a question?
You still don't get it. All I was doing was providing a link to Share
on a poll of Americans taken about Syrian intervention**for here
information. Not sure why you bother to say it is a non sequitur. *It
doesn't matter and nobody here cares! *
This is not, you should pardon the expression, rocket science.
It's basic reading comprehension.
> BTW, there were other polls taken which also showed that
> Americans by far do not support intervention in Syria. Only
> around 10% support intervention (must be MIC stockholders).
This is good. Still a non sequitur with regard to my exchange
with Share.
FYI, again nobody cares whether it is a non sequitur.
> >
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/25/us-syria-crisis-usa-poll-idUSBRE97O00E20130825
> > >
> > > On 08/27/2013 04:28 AM, Share Long wrote:
> > > > Doc, as to the difference, my guess is *they* did some
> > > > discrete polling and found out that Americans are more
> > > > outraged by the use of poison gas than they are by
> > > > artillery pointed at apartment buildings.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > > > *From:* "doctordumbass@" <doctordumbass@>
> > > > *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com>
> > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > *Sent:* Monday, August 26, 2013 9:15 PM
> > > > *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: Obombie wants his war
> > > >
> > > > I am personally really curious why poison gas use is the
> > > > magical tipping point on getting the US into this - the
> > > > moral outrage, over night. This guy has been pointing
> > > > artillery at apartment buildings, and pulling the
> > > > trigger, for months. What IS the difference?
> > > >
> > > > More an ugly waiting game to see which of the larger
> > > > powers will claim Syria's resources, and trying to
> > > > get the whole pie, if possible. When this thing
> > > > started, I recall reading about Syria's strategic position
> > > > in the Mid-East.
