Judy, outside the home does not almost create a tautology because, as in my family, spouses work outside the home, but in the same place thus are not separated in the way that was being discussed. As for attempting to accurately read my mind regarding my use of I think, you failed IMO. As for my alleged attempt regarding my alleged dishonesty, keep projecting and Happy Mental Health Day tomorrow!
On Wednesday, October 9, 2013 11:03 AM, judy stein <[email protected]> wrote: Share wrote: > Judy, unlike you who simply asserts > your opinions as facts, I say I think to designate that in > this day and age of many working at home, my statement is > qualified in that I don't know all the statistics involved. Nope, sorry, you specified spouses who work *outside the home*: "I think many spouses who work outside the home are separated from each other from [sic] most of the day." That isn't even an opinion; it's a truism, verging on a tautology. And your "I think" qualification didn't have a thing to do with not knowing the statistics. "Many" was sufficiently vague to cover any uncertainty about numbers. > > It was the "I > > think" that cracked me up, as if you might not be quite > > sure about such a trivial and obvious fact. False > > humility on your part, in other words. You do it a lot; > > it's a function of the general inauthenticity of your > > FFL persona. As is your attempt here to dishonestly extricate yourself from what I pointed out.
