Now how can Big Bopper Bevan not be a raja? Hell, he's the damn prime minister 
of the global country of hucksterism, he wears the frock and the tiara, how can 
he not be a raja?
--------------------------------------------
On Sat, 10/26/13, TurquoiseB <[email protected]> wrote:

 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Before evangelizing TM, consider your target 
audience
 To: [email protected]
 Date: Saturday, October 26, 2013, 8:09 AM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
     
       
       
       --- In [email protected],  wrote:
 
 >
 
 >  In my experience this is really good market analysis.
 I think you
 
 guys really care.
 
 >  -Buck
 
 
 
 Careful, Buck. You *know* what happens to those who dare
 
 to disagree with Ms. Authority, especially if she's gone
 on
 
 record as saying that the analyses you think are good are
 
 bad, and STOOOPID. Keep this up and you'll become
 
 FFL's next stalking victim.  :-)
 
 
 
 But yeah, I think the analysis is spot-on. The TMO's
 whole
 
 marketing strategy is based on a cultist self-importance
 
 fantasy -- that the world is filled with people who just
 can't
 
 wait to become Just Like Them.
 
 
 
 All those unhappy people out there in the world want
 
 nothing more than to "evolve" to the level in
 which they
 
 spend four hours a day sitting and grunting and bouncing
 
 around on slabs of foam in a big room full of other people
 
 Just Like Them. Having paid several thousand dollars
 
 for the privilege. Yeah, right.  :-)
 
 
 
 That's a cult fantasy. The world is full of people who
 *might*
 
 be in the market for a simple technique that could improve
 
 their lives, and allow them to enjoy them more and be more
 
 productive in them. They are *not* in the market for a
 
 technique that *eats* their lives and renders them centered
 
 on traveling across town like the Eloi marching to the
 domes
 
 of the Morlocks in "The Time Machine" twice a day
 so they
 
 can sit and grunt and bounce and sleep together. And by
 
 "sleep together" I mean use the "flying
 time" to fall asleep,
 
 not "sleep together" in the sense of gettin'
 it on with your
 
 cult buddies. There *might* be a market for that; there
 
 isn't one for convincing people to spend thousands of
 their
 
 hard-earned dollars to become a classic cultist.
 
 
 
 You know my position. I don't think the TMO has a ghost
 
 of a chance of being able to "bring more people to
 meditation"
 
 any more, because it drags along behind it the stinking
 corpse
 
 of its own bad history and bad reputation. It's like a
 parade
 
 of losers -- in the front is da King, followed by a bunch
 of
 
 Raja-dweebs in their robes and crowns, followed at a
 discrete,
 
 well-mannered, and above all *appropriate* distance by
 
 their own wives, the Rajinis, who after all are not evolved
 
 enough to walk beside their husbands. Then come the non-
 
 Raja-dweebs like Bevan (a towering zeppelin of good
 health),
 
 Hagelin (once considered a scientist and now considered a
 
 crackpot), and David Lynch (accurately considered some-
 
 thing of a pervert and the essence of gullibility itself).
 Then
 
 come all the hangers-on still clinging to the ideas of
 self-
 
 importance they were brainwashed with by Maharishi,
 
 all chanting, "Come to the domes. Join us."
 
 
 
 Yeah, right. That's gonna happen. John Q. Public is
 going
 
 to look at these nutjobs and think, "Wow...I want to be
 just
 
 like them. Honey, sell the cars...we're going to need
 the money
 
 to pay for our TM-Sidhis courses, so we can go join in the
 
 Cosmic Buttbouncing with these other paragons of
 
 enlightenment."
 
 
 
 "Twenty minutes twice a day." "No change to
 your lifestyle
 
 or your beliefs required." "You practice TM not
 for the time
 
 spent in meditation but because of how it enables you to
 spend
 
 your time *not* in meditation more fruitful and
 productive."
 
 That's the way that TM *used* to be marketed.
 
 
 
 Look at the parade of clowns trying to persuade people to
 
 become Just Like Them and *give up their lives* in favor of
 
 four or more hours a day of mass butt-bouncing. Kinda makes
 
 you think that the original TM marketing phrases from the
 
 60s were a lie, doesn't it?
 
 
 
 For the clown parade, TM became a "gateway drug"
 to life
 
 as a cultist, not to a better and more productive life by
 the
 
 standards that most people would use to measure one. And
 
 now they're like drug pushers on a school playground
 (literally)
 
 trying to entice young, naive students to try TM. "Try
 it...
 
 you'll like it. If you take advantage of the DLF special
 price,
 
 the first one's free."
 
 
 
 I think that most people are going to perceive this market-
 
 ing approach as what it is -- a fraud, perpetrated by
 cultists
 
 whose numbers are dwindling and dying off, and who are
 
 becoming increasingly desperate to swell their ranks with
 
 new suckers, just like them. Not gonna work. Not gonna
 
 happen.
 
 
 
 >  > turq, I'm encouraged by these Gallup findings
 and I'm
 
 >  > sure a lot of long term TMers would be also. The
 ones
 
 >  > I know are practical, intelligent and
 compassionate.
 
 >  > Also I bet a lot of people would love to know
 about
 
 >  > and do something for world peace. Maybe whirled
 
 >  > peas too (-:
 
 >
 
 >  My point is that the "marketing approach" of
 the TMO is that of
 
 >  cultists, while pitching their product to
 non-cultists. Many
 
 (including
 
 >  some of this forum) seem to equate "TMers"
 with "TM-Sidhas practicing
 
 in
 
 >  a group." They seem to believe that the leap from
 20 minutes twice a
 
 day
 
 >  and an average of four hours per day (including travel
 time) is "No
 
 >  Biggie," and that everyone that wants to learn TM
 wants to learn to
 
 >  butt-bounce and spend that much time away from their
 real life, too.
 
 >
 
 >  I'm merely pointing out that this is an assumption
 made by people who
 
 >  *themselves* in most cases gravitated to the
 four-hours-a-day
 
 lifestyle
 
 >  after *decades* of indoctrination by the TM movement.
 They've
 
 actually
 
 >  come to believe that such a schedule is
 "normal."
 
 >
 
 >  It ain't. And very few people who
 have...uh...lives will see it that
 
 >  way, either. They *might* be open to learning a
 simple,
 
 >  20-minutes-twice-a-day relaxation technique, but if
 the first thing
 
 that
 
 >  happens when they go to a TM center for their followup
 is that people
 
 >  start hustling them to learn the Sidhis and do them in
 a group,
 
 they're
 
 >  gonna smell cult.
 
 >
 
 >
 
 >
 
 >  >
 
 >  > Just a note of caution to those who still believe
 that "If we
 
 charge
 
 >  more/less/enough for TM, they will come," *they*
 in this case being
 
 the
 
 >  untold millions you think are required to make the
 world a better
 
 place
 
 >  and who are out there, just waiting for the right TM
 marketing
 
 approach.
 
 >  Consider who you're talking to, and what *they*
 believe.
 
 >  >
 
 >  > The latest Gallup poll doesn't seem to
 indicate that John Q.
 
 American
 
 >  Public is quite on the same wavelength that you are.
 58% of them
 
 >  probably wouldn't make it through the "15 day
 waiting period." The
 
 >  legalization of marijuana has five times the number of
 supporters as
 
 >  Congress does. 63% are unthreatened by homosexual
 behavior, and 53%
 
 >  believe that same-sex marriage should be legalized.
 The
 
 >  more-puritan-than-the-Puritans lifestyle ethic of many
 die-hard TMers
 
 >  just doesn't map to the way that most Americans
 see the world.
 
 >  >
 
 >  >
 
 >  >
 
 > 
 
 http://www.businessinsider.com/gallup-legal-marijuana-is-more-popular-th\
 
 \
 
 http://www.businessinsider.com/gallup-legal-marijuana-is-more-popular-th\
 
 \
 
 >  an-almost-anything-else-2013-10
 
 > 
 
 http://www.businessinsider.com/gallup-legal-marijuana-is-more-popular-th\
 
 \
 
 http://www.businessinsider.com/gallup-legal-marijuana-is-more-popular-th\
 
 \
 
 >  an-almost-anything-else-2013-10
 
 >  >
 
 >  > Me, I find these Gallup findings positive, and
 hopeful, because
 
 >  they're *pragmatic*, and on the whole they seem to
 indicate that
 
 >  Americans aren't quite the hyper-conservative
 know-nothings that the
 
 Tea
 
 >  Party and others would have you believe they are. But
 such pragmatism
 
 is
 
 >  not gonna be appealed to by Woo Woo propaganda about
 how many Yogic
 
 >  Flyers can butt-bounce on the head of a pin made of
 polystyrene foam,
 
 >  and how that's gonna magically create Whirled
 Peas.
 
 >  >
 
 >  > The thing that would make TM
 "marketable" again IMO would be a
 
 return
 
 >  to the more pragmatic approach of the late 60s, in
 which it was
 
 marketed
 
 >  as a simple relaxation technique that would help to
 make you less
 
 >  stressed and more productive in your real-world
 activities. Nobody
 
 gives
 
 >  a shit about enlightenment; if the Gallup organization
 polled for
 
 that
 
 >  one, my bet is that the percentage of people
 they'd find who believe
 
 it
 
 >  exists wouldn't crack two digits, and the number
 who would actually
 
 pay
 
 >  money for it would be a fraction of that.
 
 >  >
 
 >  > A non-drug technique that takes only 40 minutes
 per day and could
 
 help
 
 >  to lower stress levels is marketable. A Woo Woo
 "gateway drug" that
 
 only
 
 >  seeks to hook people on a path to spending several
 hours of their day
 
 >  bouncing on their butts with other people to create
 Whiled Peas is
 
 not.
 
 >  Just sayin'...
 
 >  >
 
 >
 
 
 
 
 
     
      
 
     
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Reply via email to