Will do authfriend - as the need and context arises. But no one is condemned of course, you see I had to take a strong stand against the ignorance and dishonesty of these three posters - Rick, Buck and Share. As I said Buck and Share seemed pretty inane and harmless, Rick OTOH not. And astonishingly none of them surely has read the book.
Of course your suggestions are welcome, you are asking me to adopt a civil, balanced tone and I have nothing against it, unfortunately my samskaras are such that I react very strongly against ignorance and dishonesty. Rather than dispute and challenge of my assessments of these three posters you seem to be making gratuitous, presumptuous remarks about my motivations and intentions which I don't agree with. Perhaps you feel I'm a newcomer and thereby should be deferential in my conversation with old timers here and adopt a civil rather than inflammatory dialogue? Either way I don't agree with that - each poster whether new or old here has an equal right, freedom to conduct a dialogue on topics of their interest here while following the rules of this list. ---In [email protected], <authfriend@...> wrote: Here's a suggestion: Why don't you talk about Amma and how awful she is rather than about individuals on FFL and how awful they are?
