You know who turned Ann's funny parody post into something poisonous and vicious, Share?
Hint: It wasn't Ann. (Or me or Emily, either.) Share blubbered: > Emily, imo, Ann viciously poisoned a fun exchange that I was having with > Richard, a tactic > used often by MGC, not only when I ignore you all, but imo precisely because > I'm enjoying > exchanges with other posters. It's one of the most vicious things that you > all do and I will > continue to respond in kind. Oh, good, Share will continue to reveal how much meaner she is than any of the rest of us. But it really is odd that Share, after several years participating in various Web forums, is still under the misapprehension that she should be able to hold a private conversation, in which nobody else is supposed to participate, in public. > btw, turq once said something mean about Judy's looks. More than once, as I just told Emily. He seems to have realized how bad it made him look, though. How long will it take you, I wonder? Grow up, for Christ's sake. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:32 PM, "emilymaenot@..." <emilymaenot@...> wrote: And look, you are still at it Share...reaching for anything to distract yourself from the fact that you wrote a mean and malicious post. I can't even think of anyone else who has stooped so low as to attack someone's personal visage, except you. Face it Share. Your post was trying to hit below the belt and create hurt. Sad, but true. No biggie, just the "bad" part of the "blend of good and bad" (and I paraphrase what you say there) that human beings are, right? No reason to apologize. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote: imo, RWC is the #1 big reason you all keep attacking me. Expecially you, Judy, the number 1 grudge holder maybe on the internet if what others say is true. Since that seems to be what's needed to be Queen Bee, I'm happy to let you keep that job. As for Emily, why exclude Obbajee and Susan? Except that my exchanges with them disproves what Emily initially said about me. From the beginning I've acknowledged that I have flaws. But Judy, when you don't like someone, it's as if you put on black glasses and see the person only through them. Worse, you either don't see that you've got the glasses on, or you won't admit that you do. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote: Unlike you, Emily has integrity. So when you claimed that you liked Obbajeeba and Susan, she took you at your word and amended what she said about you to exclude them. And after she'd done that to accommodate your claim, you accused her of saying Obbajeeba and Susan weren't "strong and beautiful" and demanded to know how she accounted for your claim not to be threatened by them--when she'd just got done accounting for it. It's all right here in black and white, Share, but you simply can't acknowledge the facts. One of the big reasons we keep going after you, Share, is because of your inability to be straightforward when there's any kind of conflict--one more unmistakeable sign that your saintly pose is just that, a pose, not the real Share. You twist and obfuscate and conceal and confound and create massive muddles to protect yourself from having to deal with reality. And the reality is, as Emily so aptly points out, that your posts are not "cute," you are not the Queen Bee of FFL that you'd like to see yourself as. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote: > I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you both > want to > exclude them from Emily's assessment for an obvious reason. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:32 PM, "authfriend@..." <authfriend@...> wrote: No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a parenthetical is, right?) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote: No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, "authfriend@..." <authfriend@...> wrote: You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that interesting!? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote: Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, "emilymaenot@..." <emilymaenot@...> wrote: This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write. Share, I say this based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies them. You are *not* cute, Share. I wonder if you have the ability to apologize for this? You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share (the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee. You simply aren't. Get over it.
