On 12/20/2013 11:49 AM, [email protected] wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, <punditster@...> wrote:
So, why don't you set a macro for Share? LoL!
/Richard Macro (#1)/
//
/Do you tint your hair? Go figure./
/Do you have any hair to tint?
/
//
On 12/20/2013 9:52 AM, authfriend@... <mailto:authfriend@...> wrote:
See, Share, some might say that the mean-spirited snark in your post
not only far outweighs any positive effect of the purported
compliment, but suggests that there is actually no genuine positive
feeling behind the compliment. All the energy is in the snark; the
purported compliment is lifeless.
IOW, Emily's comment highlighting the snark and ignoring the
compliment is far more honest than either your original post or your
response here.
Share whined:
<< See, Emily, imo your post is a form of dishonesty because you
leave out the part where I say the tree and photo are lovely. And
it's sneaky dishonesty to boot. >>
On Friday, December 20, 2013 8:53 AM, "emilymaenot@..."
<mailto:emilymaenot@...> <emilymaenot@...> <mailto:emilymaenot@...>
wrote:
Re: I shall now enlighten you both about my immediate and mundane
reaction to the photo of her Christmas tree that Ann posted. Hold
onto your seatbelts! "Huh?! But wait a minute! I've seen this photo
before! Is this the same photo Ann posted last year?!"
*/Yes, Barry is correct. Share definitely exhibits "range and an
ability to feel positive emotion." I'm all teared up with this warm
and fuzzy response. /*
