---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, <punditster@...> wrote:
So, why don't you set a macro for Share? LoL!
Richard Macro (#1)
Do you tint your hair? Go figure.
On 12/20/2013 9:52 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
See, Share, some might say that the mean-spirited snark in your post not
only far outweighs any positive effect of the purported compliment, but
suggests that there is actually no genuine positive feeling behind the
compliment. All the energy is in the snark; the purported compliment is
lifeless.
IOW, Emily's comment highlighting the snark and ignoring the compliment is far
more honest than either your original post or your response here.
Share whined:
<< See, Emily, imo your post is a form of dishonesty because you leave out the
part where I say the tree and photo are lovely. And it's sneaky dishonesty to
boot. >>
On Friday, December 20, 2013 8:53 AM, "emilymaenot@..." mailto:emilymaenot@...
<emilymaenot@...> mailto:emilymaenot@... wrote:
Re: I shall now enlighten you both about my immediate and mundane reaction
to the photo of her Christmas tree that Ann posted. Hold onto your seatbelts!
"Huh?! But wait a minute! I've seen this photo before! Is this the same photo
Ann posted last year?!"
Yes, Barry is correct. Share definitely exhibits "range and an ability to
feel positive emotion." I'm all teared up with this warm and fuzzy response.
