Yeah, with Thunderbird all you have to do is hit the delete key if you
don't like to read the message and then move on to something more
interesting. Anyone that is still using the Yahoo Neo web site for their
news reader could benefit from moving up to something more
sophisticated. The Google Chrome browser also makes a decent newsreader.
Yahoo sucks as a news reader!
On 12/20/2013 10:59 AM, Bhairitu wrote:
Ever try this group with an email client like Thunderbird? It's a
completely different experience from the web site. It's so easy to
ignore of anxiety prone threads this way. Plus one can read the group
so many different ways including custom ones. That's why I always
opposed posting limits because they seemed to be an indicator of some
kind of immaturity of the users who just needed to grow up.
On 12/20/2013 02:25 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
>
> Rick booted indifferent_netizen, who seems to have been Ravi. It
appears that Ravi is subscribed under another ID, and by using the
hide email address option and constantly changing Yahoo aliases, he
can post as he pleases and not get booted off. That's the price of
Rick configuring FFL for anonymous posting.
*/Having just scrolled /**/*/in Message View /*through the list of 86
posts made since I logged out last night, and having not found a
single one that I felt like clicking on to read, I've gotta respond
to Alex's drive-by with a hearty "I told you so."
The problem is not anonymous posting; the problem is using this place
as a forum for ego-wars and petty squabbles, and mistaking them for
intelligent conversation. 825 posts since midnight Friday, and over
half of them fall into the above category, posted by only a handful
of people. This handful have by now established enough of a "track
record" that I feel safe in ignoring anything they have to say for
the rest of the incarnation.
The old posting limits may have been a pain for you, Alex, but they
kept this place *somewhat* readable and worth visiting. I have to say
it's gone past that point now. I scan the list of posts and the only
names I'm even tempted to click on are anartaxius and s3raphita and
Bhairitu and merudanda and steve.sundur and occasionally emptybill
and cardemaister.
Doc occasionally posts something interesting and non-"Look At Me"
these days but it's difficult to tell from the first few words in
Message View so I usually give his posts a pass just to be sure.
Share seems to have two qualities her tormentors do not -- range and
an ability to feel positive emotion -- but to be honest most of the
things she's interested in I'm not, so I often skip her posts, too.
MichaelJ and Edg are occasionally funny, so I sometimes give their
posts a shot.
I *understand* that the old posting limits were a pain for you, Alex,
and I don't blame you in the least for wanting them gone. But I DO
have to point out that what many warned of as the consequence of
getting rid of them seems to have come to pass, in spades.
There are essentially NO new posters; who would *want* to come here,
given what the place has degenerated into? Some of the old voices
have moved on as well, possibly partially because of Neo, but my bet
is they don't see anything here worth participating in, either.
I guess in a way I should be thankful, because my "reading" of
Fairfield Life now takes less than five minutes a day. That suits me
just fine, because I actually have a life, and things to do.
Sad though, that so few could have been allowed to ruin a place that
was formerly enjoyed by many...
/*