Now that's the holiday spirit, Judy, your being so concerned about my karma! 
Feliz Navidad!





On Sunday, December 22, 2013 9:23 PM, "[email protected]" 
<[email protected]> wrote:
 
  
Oh, Share, don't help Richard lie more than he already has. That's really bad 
karma.

And don't be sneaky. Own your resentments and put them right up front. It isn't 
as if you can actually hide them, you know.



<< Richard, I think you left out someone named Sal and someone named Ruth. >> 





On Sunday, December 22, 2013 7:59 PM, Richard J. Williams <punditster@...> 
wrote:
 
  
On 12/20/2013 1:08 PM, authfriend@... wrote:

One begins to suspect that he is intentionally doing his best to destroy the 
forum (possibly out of resentment that he was never able to attract the 
attention he craved while the posting limits were in effect).
Well, it sure seemed to get Judy's attention, but it should be noted that Judy 
was one of the prime reasons for the posting limit being put into effect in the 
first place - she being one of the most prolific posters on FFL of all time, as 
she remains to this day. 
>
>So, I don't have a problem with anyone posting as much as they want
    to - it only takes a few minutes each day to scroll through to see
    if there's anything interesting to read. Like Barry, I mostly just
    skip Judy's messages, since 90% of them are just like Bill noted -
    prattle. The rest of Judy's posts are mostly just nit-picking and
    name-calling. Nothing here, just move on.
>
>However, I'm not the first person to post a comment on Judy
    attempting to get rid of other posters by trying to humiliate them
    into silence. The list is pretty long - the main ones that come to
    mind off the top of my head include  Dr. Pete, Lawson, Curtis,
    Robin, Vaj, Steve, Feste, and of course Share and Richard. Have I
    left anyone out?
>


Reply via email to