I suppose the question of the nature of the soul would be valuable, if the soul exists. I do not see any reason to suppose why something called a soul exists, or whether something like an aetheric body exists either. If these have no observable characteristics, then they have the same characteristics as nothing. Science could not alter what has no perceptible manifestation.
- [FairfieldLife] The Sexless Nature of the Soul wgm4u
- [FairfieldLife] RE: The Sexless Nature of the Soul authfriend
- [FairfieldLife] RE: The Sexless Nature of the Soul anartaxius