It was ridiculous because you knew the answer to begin with. Asking it
made you look "stoopid." Besides my statement was facetious so like
someone said the other day you seem to be irony challenged. I would
expect you to be better than that.
There is no difference between the bourgeoisie and capitalist elite.
Bourgeoisie is just an antiquated term for the same thing. But I do
think Marx rather lamely defined it too since it would have indicted
artists and musicians too. He should have just stuck to those who
profit off the labors of others which apparently Mike believes is OK.
On 01/05/2014 09:39 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
*Why was it ridiculous, Tovarich?*
*And what's the difference between the bourgeoisie and the ruling
capitalist elite?*
<< Comrade Mike, you mean the bourgeoisie. Comrade Judy's question
was ridiculous anyway. >>
On 01/05/2014 07:07 AM, Mike Dixon wrote:
The *ruling capitolist elite* of course! You know, the *banksters*
and Illuminati, Mwahahahahahahahaaha.
*From:* "authfriend@..." <mailto:authfriend@...> <authfriend@...>
<mailto:authfriend@...>
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
*Sent:* Saturday, January 4, 2014 11:48 AM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Let's talk about the big gorilla
in the room
"They" who?
<< Football is probably the closest thing they could come to
gladiators killing each other to satisfy the masses with bread and
circuses. it's a national distraction. >>
