Thank you for sharing those stories - so what kind of experiences did you have 
on that 1st 6 month course? And did you get the sutra for understanding the 
language of animals? That's the one I always wanted.
--------------------------------------------
On Sat, 2/8/14, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Raam
 To: [email protected]
 Date: Saturday, February 8, 2014,
       
       Hey
 Mike,
 Since I know you like this
 kind of thing, I'll relate a few stories from the time I
 was on the first six month course along with Andy Rhymer,
 Rick Archer and others.  In fact, Andy was in my small
 group, along with some "108's".  It was
 our responsbility to correspond on Maharishi's behalf
 with some the other teacher's and 108's who were
 stationed around the world.  I remember getting letters
 from, I believe, Michael Brule, was teaching in Iran and was
 getting harassed by the Shaw's secret service.  I
 believe it was called the Savak, (yes, just checked it, and
 that is correct).  In fact, I think he was even
 imprisoned for a time.  He was feeling pretty
 discouraged.
 At any rate, I remember Andy
 describing his experience of doing Puja, and describing wave
 after wave of bliss.  I also remember him describing to
 Maharishi some past life experiences, and saying each
 previous incarnation was displayed as a sort of statue park,
 during an experience he had.
 Probably the best moment was
 when Andy was talking directly to Maharishi, who was there
 in the room, as he often was, and telling Maharishi that the
 most important part of enlightenment was devotion to the
 Master.  Maharishi said it was the most
 "natural", and Andy kept insisting that it was the
 most "important". There was a sweet back and forth
 that when on for a while like that.  
 As to Andy being, or
 becoming an alleged pedophile, don't have an answer for
 that.  Edg is on record here saying that he'd
 remove the alleged part.
 If that is a
 disqualification for being enlightened, I really can't
 say.  I'm not familiar with all the ins and outs of
 it. But it does seem that many who may have done some heavy
 lifting to get that point, (of enlightenment) will sometimes
 take a funny detour.
 As for Robin, yes I found
 him extraordinary in many ways. Whether he had classic NPS,
 I couldn't say, but it sure seemed that way to me much
 of the time.  But then again, it doesn't register
 with me much if a person is said to be enlightened or
 not.
 
 ---In [email protected], <mjackson74@...>
 wrote:
 
 M said Robin
 Carlsen and Andy Rhymer were enlightened.
 
 --------------------------------------------
  On Fri, 2/7/14, steve.sundur@...
 <steve.sundur@...>
 wrote:
 
 
 
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Raam
 
 To: [email protected]
 
 Date: Friday, February 7, 2014, 10:26 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Speaking
 
 for myself, I never felt I was guaranteed enlightenment.
 
  Yea, I know all about cc in 5 - 7 years, but I never
 
 put much stock in that,nor did I know others who did.
 
  
 
 Perhaps that was the extent
 
 of the misrepresentation, it you're looking for a
 
 "smoking gun", at least as far as the
 
 "gaining enlightenment" part.
 
 Otherwise, I think people
 
 got involved either for a vision of possibilities, or
 
 because because they were looking for
 "something",
 
 and this seemed to offer some potential.
 
 But as for declaring such
 
 and such a person as "enlightened", that would
 
 appear to be pretty out of place in any tradition I'm
 
 familiar with. 
 
 Spiritual growth is a pretty
 
 personal matter, not something you're likely to crow
 
 about.
 
 
 
 ---In [email protected],
 <turquoiseb@...>
 
 wrote:
 
 
 
 --- In
 
 [email protected],
  wrote:
 
 >
 
 > Now, wait.  This sort of sounds like a set up.  I say
 
 this because you have always been a proponent of the
 
 "these (supposed) states of consciousness are all
 
 subjective and can't be proven".  So, why would
 
 such a declaration be important to you?
 
 
 
 
 
 It
 
 wouldn't be the least bit important to me. But
 you'd
 
 think it might be important to Maharishi (who sold this
 
 supposed state of consciousness for close to 50 years) to
 be
 
 able to point to even one of his students who embodied it.
 
 After all, if he didn't, people might begin to think
 
 that the sales pitch was a pile of crap.
 
 
     
      
 
     
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Reply via email to