Dig deep Share.  Try to put a little effort into what you say so that you have 
a little credibility to go with it.  I googled the phrase and here is what I 
found -  (not just taken from the drop down window; that doesn't tell you 
anything....try to remember this for next time, even though you have 
acknowledged that Ann is RIGHT in determining that you are not tech savvy) -  
in full and cited appropriately with quotation marks.   

 “A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little 
statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has 
simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the 
wall. Speak what you think now in hard words, and to-morrow speak what 
to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said 
to-day. — 'Ah, so you shall be sure to be misunderstood.' — Is it so bad, then, 
to be misunderstood? Pythagoras was misunderstood, and Socrates, and Jesus, and 
Luther, and Copernicus, and Galileo, and Newton, and every pure and wise spirit 
that ever took flesh. To be great is to be misunderstood.”
― Ralph Waldo Emerson 
http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/12080.Ralph_Waldo_Emerson, Self-Reliance 
http://www.goodreads.com/work/quotes/1758578
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote :

 Judy, it was an honest mistake. When I put consistency is the hobgoblin in the 
google window, that's what the drop downs showed. They did not show the word 
foolish.
 

 On Friday, March 28, 2014 7:38 PM, "authfriend@..." <authfriend@...> wrote:
 
   Ooooooooopsie-Share. You left a word out of that quote there, didn'cha? How 
dishonest is that?
 

 OTOH, consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, etc.
 

 

 Translation: If you think I'm going to acknowledge being inconsistent right 
here in front of God and everybody, you've got another think coming. What a 
nerve!
 
 

 Emily, that's a very interesting perspective.
 

 
 
 On Friday, March 28, 2014 1:56 PM, "emilymaenot@..." <emilymaenot@...> wrote:
 
   That's not the point Share.  How do you know that "you do not use Apple 
computers" is a *true* statement? Depends on how you define the word "use" 
maybe?  Maybe you "use" them indirectly as both Ann and I have Apple products 
that we "use" to post here and you are "using" my post to reply to.  I'm not 
judging the "appropriateness" of your choice of "right" and "wrong", I'm just 
reminding you that, based on what you wrote, you *do* reduce things to "right" 
and "wrong", thus invalidating or rendering inconsistent your statement that 
you don't think like that.  My answer to your answer is "I don't know."  Smile. 
 
 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote :

 So Emily, when Ann wrote about me "you do not use Apple computers" what do you 
think would have been an appropriate answer?!
 

 
 
 On Friday, March 28, 2014 1:28 PM, "emilymaenot@..." <emilymaenot@...> wrote:
 
   Ok, if you say so. (RIGHT) I figure you are not very savvy technically 
(RIGHT) and that you do not use Apple computers.(RIGHT) I figure you did not 
know Apple Stores existed (RIGHT) nor did you realize how cool they are, all 
simplistic design, glass and that they call their computer experts "geniuses". 
(RIGHT) I figure you figure that getting out of FF twice a year amounts to some 
sort of cultural pinnacle (WRONG) and I figure you took exception to me making 
fun of the fact you don't know about Apple Stores.(WRONG) Is that enough 
figuring for one day do you think? (DON'T KNOW)

 

 Well Share, you indicated 5 rights, 2 wrongs, and 1 don't know. it appears 
that you *do* look at at least some things in a right and wrong kind of a way.  
Are you *sure* you know enough to use those terms, even as you apply them to 
you? Very black and white thinking, imho. I am surprised that you didn't know 
that Apple stores even existed!  

 

 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote :

 Well Emily, Ann was making assumptions about me and I was giving her feedback 
about her assumptions about me...
 

 
 
 On Friday, March 28, 2014 12:40 PM, "emilymaenot@..." <emilymaenot@...> wrote:
 
   I understand what you are saying Share, but you still "interpreted" her 
"figuring" as "right and wrong."  Are you experiencing cognitive dissonance 
right now - in the sense that your behavior is not in line with your beliefs?

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote :

 But Emily I was replying to what Ann wrote which was all about figuring...
 

 
 
 On Friday, March 28, 2014 11:59 AM, "emilymaenot@..." <emilymaenot@...> wrote:
 
   But Share, we are talking about what you wrote, not what Ann wrote.  You are 
slipping into your shadow side again. :)  Stand up Sweetie...you wrote it.  

 














 














 















 















 















 


 











Reply via email to