Well that does help Michael, at least in understanding where you are coming 
from.  If you view that student's essay as both excellent, and as an an 
embodiment of truth, then I think are taking a kool aid of a different sort. 

 I would say it implies you have a pretty low threshold for you would consider 
unbiased reporting.
 

 Obviously you don't see it that way.
 

---In [email protected], <mjackson74@...> wrote :

 Oh and it was one of the most ridiculous post you have ever made, this one. Of 
course I think what I post here has merit, why else would I post?
 --------------------------------------------
 On Sun, 4/20/14, steve.sundur@... mailto:steve.sundur@... <steve.sundur@... 
mailto:steve.sundur@...> wrote:
 
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Student Housing and More
 To: [email protected] mailto:[email protected]
 Date: Sunday, April 20, 2014, 8:59 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Michael, the
 issue is not whether or not to read your posts.  That
 is what they call a red herring. And you're tactic of
 labeling everyone with whom you disagree as a "cult
 apologist" has, frankly, gotten a little
 old.
 The
 issue is whether or not you feel some obligation to take a
 look at what you post and see if it has merit, or how much
 merit it might have. 
 Does
 that make sense to you?
 I
 say that because the piece you posted from the student about
 Utopia Park and the Pundit housing would come across to most
 any reader, either in or out of the TMO as quite
 biased.
 At
 least, that's how I see it.
 On
 the other hand, maybe that matters not to you.  As long
 as it's anti TM, it's got to be good.  Like
 Smucker's Jam.
 ---In
 [email protected] mailto:[email protected], 
<mjackson74@...> wrote
 :
 
 hey, I lived there
 when they had the pods - I bet I would have loved one-a
 those double wides in those days. I do like the
 juxtaposition of the pundits living quarters that look like
 the photos of the old Nazi stalags next to the "Utopia
 Park" - and the man raises some fair points, which you
 who are still seemingly attempting to find a reason to find
 something wonderful is happening in the TM world don't
 much like. If you find my posts so unpleasant why read
 'em?
 
 --------------------------------------------
 On Sun, 4/20/14, steve.sundur@...
 <steve.sundur@...>
 wrote:
 
 
 
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Student Housing and More
 
 To: [email protected] mailto:[email protected]
 
 Date: Sunday, April 20, 2014, 5:13 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Well, at
 
 least it makes it easy to see why you regard anyone who
 
 disagrees with you a cult apologist.
 
 It
 
 looks like the only reason you view this as an excellent
 
 essay is because it trashes something you don't like.
 
 Sort of like what Judy was discussing earlier.  There
 
 is no issue of fairness or unfairness.  No issue of
 
 whether there might be another side to it.  It trashes
 
 something you like to see trashed so therefore it is
 
 excellent, and anyone with a dissenting opinion is
 
 "afraid of the truth"
 
 Damn
 
 you've covered all the bases today
 
 Michael!
 
 but
 
 can you imagine if you were on the other side of something
 
 like this in real life?  then I suppose it would be a
 
 different story.  But on an internet forum, hey, no
 
 need to even attempt something approaching a balanced
 
 approach. 
 
 
 
 ---In [email protected] mailto:[email protected],
 <mjackson74@...>
 
 wrote :
 
 
 
 Egggg-cellent essay by a
 
 current MUM student - those who aren't afraid of the
 
 truth, click the link and read on! The photos are quite
 
 interesting.
 
 
 
 
 
 http://mumosa.com/mum-stories/mum-residential-irony.htmlMUM 
http://mumosa.com/mum-stories/mum-residential-irony.htmlMUM
 
 Residential IronyA
 
 student of Maharishi University of Management, I’m
 
 bothered by a few things associated with the
 
 school.View
 
 on mumosa.comPreview
 
 by
 
 Yahoo
 
   


Reply via email to