On 8/6/2014 9:08 AM, Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
I agree - I was surprised that Bucky would say something about proving
darshan - but maybe he was joking. But then he hardly ever jokes about
his saintly stuff. I wonder if he takes an iPod w/speakers out in the
pastures and plays gandharva veda tunes to his sheep?
>
So, I'd say you're living proof that "darshan" exists since you've
apparently made such an impression on Knapp and Gina over on TM-Free. I
wonder how much money Knapp makes off the ads on his site? You should be
getting a cut, but how much? Go figure.
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* "awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Wednesday, August 6, 2014 9:52 AM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Science and the Meissner Effect of
Consciousness as Field
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mjackson74@...> wrote :
Prove darshan exists - its a made up feel good deal. There are people
who met Marshy and didn't feel shit for energy from him. So how do you
account for that?
Just interjecting here - I haven't been around anyone with this thing
you call darshan and I certainly don't believe in "saints". Saints are
renderings on canvas and in sculpture of mythical creatures who
existed centuries ago and were memorialized in works of art. There are
only human beings. Some are charismatic, some could charm the pants
(literally) off someone and some can make you do all sorts of things
like spend lots of money or time doing things they want you to do.
However, there is power and there is energy and there is all sorts of
stuff going on in the universe that is mysterious and scary and
wonderful and invisible. The fact that some can feel the purported
darshan from MMY and some don't is just like some people can be moved
or can appreciate or feel the power in a great piece of music or art
or film and some simply don't get it. It's in the perception of the
perceiver, not necessarily inherent or not inherent in the object,
person or event.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* salyavin808 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Wednesday, August 6, 2014 7:44 AM
*Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: Science and the Meissner Effect of
Consciousness as Field
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <dhamiltony2k5@...> wrote :
Yes quite evidently you and the other anti-meditation anti-science
folks here are afraid of where the data is going. Your asserting no
data therefore no replication and therefore it can't be talked about
or researched.
You need psychiatric help.
Asserting that it does not exist defies reality and scientific
process itself of data, observation, hypothesis and testing . Lawson
is looking at how to replicate given the practical constraints of such
a project given the data. You completely miss-interpret to your own
vile ends. You evidently don't want anything to happen less it disturb
your anti-meditation and anti-spiritual grumblings. You contend the
research can't be replicated and shouldn't be, well talk about
subterfuge and anti-science anti-intellectualism. Next we'll hear from
you that there never was such a thing as darshan where obviously there
is and then you'll say it is not worth trying to look at for fear of
what we might find. Did you just renew your membership down at the
local conservative Anglican Church or something that you come on so
regressive like you do?
Is this your enlightenment Buck? A refusal to read what people say and
then project some weird victim fantasy onto anyone who doesn't
automatically accept the great master Hagelin at his word? Read it
again and respond to what I say, not your paranoid fantasies.
