--- In [email protected], akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A: > > > So you do believe the state should have control of a woman's body? > > S: > > I believe that the state has an interest in upholding contracts. > > > > And I believe if someone enters into a sexual relationship which > > leads to a conception that BOTH parties have the right -- an EQUAL > > right -- to what happens to that conception. > > > > Simple and straightforward contract law. > > > > That's why if a woman is raped -- that is, conception happens > > against her will -- there is no contract and she has every right in > > the world to abort that fetus. > > So you are arguing for patriarchal rights. Thats fine. So if the > mother and father agree on an abortion, then you therefore hold that > they should be permited to do so?
If the mother and father agree, then they should, at the very least, have all the rights that the current legal structure afford the mother. > Without restriction? I don't understand...what do you mean "without restriction"...restriction for whom? ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
