Heard yesterday from SF Bay Area comedian Will Durst:
/"Why's everyone blaming Obama? He hasn't done anything."
/On 09/09/2014 11:10 AM, Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
Well, why did we abandon the Mujaheddin the first time if we wanted
all those minerals? Didn't we go into Iraq the second time for all
that oil? "No blood for oil".Why did we leave that? Did the US
actually support ISIS? As I recall, there were several anti- Assad
resistance groups, some *good* some *bad*. We didn't know which to
support. Maybe Obama has been letting the world go- in- a- hand basket
while cutting defense, letting the military industrial complex stock
values decline in order to buy at a low price, knowing we would have
to rev it up in the future and watch it's value increase. Buy low ,
sell high! There are boogeymen everywhere!
On Tuesday, September 9, 2014 9:12 AM, "Bhairitu
noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]"
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
The US funded the Mujahideen to fight against the Russians in
Afghanistan. Why? Because greedy US businessmen wanted their hands on
the recently revealed to the public rich resources in the Afghanistan
(which was why Russians were there in the first place). Then the
Mujahideen because Al-Qaeda and a new boogeyman to get the American
people in a "war mood" and support spending heavily on defense which
of course profited the military industrial complex. Then the US
supported ISIS to help overthrow the Syrian government. Now they are
the new boogeyman to drum up more defense spending. Best way to
defeat ISIS was to not support them in the first place.
On 09/08/2014 07:34 PM, jr_...@yahoo.com <mailto:jr_...@yahoo.com>
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
It's the formation of a new government in Iraq, according to Kerry.
IMO, this indeed is the most reasonable of all approaches, along
with the necessary support from world governments to defeat ISIS.
https://news.yahoo.com/kerry-heads-mideast-talks-islamic-state-180834352.html
