---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote :

 Steve, I like what you're saying here which is that we don't yet know all the 
laws governing gravity. And I think this is a very scientific attitude. I bet 
we don't know all the laws about anything yet! Including how human bodies 
obtain energy from their surroundings. Which kind of makes the future 
fascinating to consider (-:

 
Sorry you wild wild things, I don't think there will be any surprises from 
gravity and metabolism, I think we've got those pretty sussed - at least as far 
as floating and not eating for 70 years is concerned LOL.
 

 Happy to be persuaded otherwise by some evidence though.
 

 

 On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 1:18 AM, "steve.sundur@... [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
 

   Given that there are plenty of ways he could be cheating I know where I'm 
going to put my money.

 

 Sure, what interested me was that the environment seemed to be controlled.  I 
suppose it could be a case of deception, but I haven't looked into it to see if 
there are accusations of that sort.  And of course, that can be a somewhat an 
easy out.  "It seems impossible, so there must be some deception going on"  
 

 

 The below isn't one of them I'm afraid as there is nothing unusual or contrary 
about it other than it appears counter to our expectations drawn from the sort 
of things we usually run into. Supercooled helium isn't a day-to-day occurrence 
and it isn't defeating gravity in any way. Nor has anything else anyone has 
ever come across, apart from anecdotally and what are we to make of that?

 

 Well, that is what I am saying.  Right now, the relationship between body and 
akasha and the lightness of cotton fiber could not result in levitation because 
it would appear to violate the laws of gravity.  But if somehow, someone 
levitated by utilizing that formula, then we suddenly modify our understanding  
of how gravity would work in that situation.
 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

  
 I didn't use the word hogwash, bullshit would be closer to it anyway. This guy 
in Australia was caught out, there was no magic going on. I don't know why 
people not eating would be a sign of anything great anyway, it's the sort of 
thing I'd avoid in a guru. I like my chips and gravy too much to be impressed 
by thinness. But the lure of magic is enough for a lot of people I suppose, 
it's always interested me, I'm an eternal optimist but becoming rather 
sceptical these days.

 

 Wait a second.  What does it matter if you think it's silly?  That has nothing 
to do with it.  What has everything to do with it, is that it is, on the 
surface, impossible.  I did a quick search to try to find some deception about 
it.  This guy below states, "It's a fraud, because I say it is".  He doesn't 
cite any obvious deception.  His says, "I am a (self proclaimed)  authority on 
such matters, and I declare it to be a deception"  
 

 Has This Man Gone 70 Years Without Eating? UPDATE: Chill Out, Everyone. He 
Obviously Has Not. 
http://www.treehugger.com/green-food/has-this-man-gone-70-years-without-eating-update-chill-out-everyone-he-obviously-has-not.html

 
 
 
http://www.treehugger.com/green-food/has-this-man-gone-70-years-without-eating-update-chill-out-everyone-he-obviously-has-not.html
 
 Has This Man Gone 70 Years Without Eating? UPDATE: ... 
http://www.treehugger.com/green-food/has-this-man-gone-70-years-without-eating-update-chill-out-everyone-he-obviously-has-not.html
 Okay, here's a weird one. You may remember the story of Prahlad Jani, an 
Indian yogi who claims that he hasn't ever eaten or had a drink in the last 70 
year...


 
 View on www.treehugger.com 
http://www.treehugger.com/green-food/has-this-man-gone-70-years-without-eating-update-chill-out-everyone-he-obviously-has-not.html
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

 

 

 

 A corrupt study is always a possibility, conversely we shouldn't accept 
potentially corrupt information just because the claimed result gives succour 
to our cherished beliefs, not if we are interested in truth anyway. 
 

 Well, of course!  What would  being intellectually dishonest get you.  Nothing 
but delusions.
 

 Having a threshold of credibility is a good plan, it means you have a handy 
way of weeding out the bullshit at the start but it shouldn't be so rigid that 
you become blinkered. What you need is a good working knowledge about something 
before you consider contrary evidence. We can always be wrong but the discovery 
of a chakra - whatever that means- in the brain that creates nectar of this 
usefulness (or at all) would be a major discovery. Let's hope for the diet 
industry's sake if no one elses that this guy has broken the laws of 
conservation of energy, as well as a few others.
 

 I'll bet good money that he hasn't though...
 

 Well, as I said, in case I missed something, nothing came up as evidence of 
fraud in this case in the initial google search.
 

 People in general may like KK but she isn't defying the laws of nature, even 
though her arse appears to be stretching them sometimes.

 

 I don't care what anyone thinks, and this is not scientific, but everything 
seems to be speeding up.  Sure, you can say it's all about technology, and 
maybe it is.  But nothing seems to stay in the news cycle for more than a few 
minutes.  It happens, and then it's in the rearview mirror. 
 

 The silly Kardashians feel compelled to do something titillating or outrageous 
every week or so, to stay in the limelight. I hope we can forget about them, 
soon as well.
 

 

 
 .

 

 

 
 
 
 



 
 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

  


  






 
  







 


 










Reply via email to