On 9/29/2014 10:59 AM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
On 09/28/2014 11:42 PM, salyavin808 wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <noozguru@...> wrote :
On 09/28/2014 02:10 PM, salyavin808 wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>, <noozguru@...>
<mailto:noozguru@...> wrote :
Nothing wrong with a tin foil hat especially if you have a
smartphone on the night stand beside your bed. ;-)
I've never thought that Al-Qaeda had anything to do with 9-11
but were a scapegoat that the "average bumpkin" would believe
in. I follow the idea that it was done by a small group, part
of them within our government and some from major corporations
who would profit in a middle east war and the building up of
defense. This is not the first time such shit has happened in
history.
I don't buy it. Too much at stake, nothing stays secret forever.
The amount of people who would have to know is too high. Imagine
the shock if it turned out to be true? But at least the
"Truthers" have moved on from the original paranoia that Dubya's
brother did it with traditional demolition methods.
"Small group", Salvy, "small group." They eliminate those who
might tattle (or who tried). The truth movement has been
manipulated too. But the easiest thing to do to anyone who is on
the right track is to call them a "conspiracy theorist" so the
sheeple won't listen to them. Miss Marple would be appalled by
you. :-D
But who eliminated the people who did the eliminating? And who
eliminated the people who gave the order to eliminate them? The
Buck stops somewhere. And if the WTC7 building was the target why
not just blow that one up? And if starting a war with Saddam
Hussien was the main goal why didn't they fake some documents to
find in Iraq linking him with global terrorism, or anything that
might have given them justification? As I remember it, there were
red faces all round when it turned out that he didn't have any
banned weapons, would have been easy fake that too, it isn't like
we hadn't sold him loads a few decades before. Maybe "they" were
trying to discredit the government of the USA too for some
unknowm nefarious purpose....
I don't call it a conspiracy theory just because it's a handy label.
Yup, Miss Marple would be VERY appalled. :-D
Maybe it's not fair of me because I'm one up on you. You see, my late
brother was a Vietnam War era defense contractor. I've seen how the
thing works from the inside. I'm met CIA agents. Your Ministry of
Defense likes to keep you in the dark by feeding you a lot of propaganda.
9-11 was undoubtedly one of the biggest crimes in history. But the
folks in the peanut gallery get their history from Popular Mechanics.
Go figger.
>
Put up or shut up. If there is any new evidence about the 9/11 attacks
please post a link so we can read it for ourselves. Thanks.
/'Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report'/
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/1227842
>
