dhyana ("gliding")
Are they really Gliding.??
The mind is always by its
functioning based on the principle of three gunas: Rishi - Davata-
Chanddhas
"I am Hagen" (subject -
awareness - object) or "You question me" etc.. There is nothing les than
three. If you take one aspect, trying to isolate it, the two
others
silently come along.
Think about it thoroughly !
If you say "I".... and
you stop saying more, trying to hide that you wanted to say sometzhing more,
then silently at least the question "I" means what ? By this the three gunas
have been joining together automatically. Either you can make some statement
or you are speech- and meaningless. If you state something, the three are
obviously involved. If you do not state sonething, they are still involved,
because the avoidance as such implies the same again.
Dharana - Dhyana-Samadhi
are synonyms of this first "triangle" of attributes, the same as
sat-chit-ananda are synonyms to the second triangle, Brahma-Vishnu-Shiva
another one or sattwa-rajas-tamas and so
forth.
Dr. Peter Plichta has
been finding innumerous of such three-attributes based principles in
various science disciplines (see also God's secret formula,
Element Books).
Even without practicing
the siddhis you are under the influence of the same mind-principles. You
can fix a thought (or a an object), but it has to automatically turn into
something else, otherwise it would "burn" a hole in your mind, in case it
stayed at the same spot. This act of metamorphosis is the gliding-aspect,
which ends up in an "ecstasy" or new manifestation.
(Some practical exercise:
Draw a cube on a piece of paper and let your mind contemplate on the form
with open eyes. Try to fix it as good as you can. After a few seconds it will
turn its space-direction from back-ground to fore-ground and after a few
seconds back again and so forth.)
If you start with a
mantra you will easily glide (slipping on a banana peel - see
Course on SCI !!)
automatically into
samadhi (pure consciousness).
Due to the three-guna principle the result is
samadhi.
What does three gunas has
to do with Samadhi.??
Samadhi is the sattwa
guna of the mind (pure ground of consciousness). Dhyana is the rajas-aspect
(dynamic movement) and
dharana is the
tamas-aspect of the mind (fruit or result or manifestation out of the dynamics
of the dhyana-force). The rsult has to to dissolve again, and that is being
done by the influence of transcendence (Samadhi). All three gunas can never be
seen as isolated.
That means, if Samadhi
starts to render its influence, it needs its rajas-nature inherent in it in
order to give place for a new result (manifestation), which is also part of
the sattwic force. This is an infinitely endless and minute process,
taking place at every moment and everywhere, because there is no "space" left
in between any of these processes (advaita-aspect = non-divisibility). And in
thoses moments itself it takes place innumerable times.
99% of the TM-Teachers all over the world have been leaving the
movement. Many of them are still teaching. That is, what Maharishi
wanted.
made so many minds become
independent, not anymore bound to the master. This is the lesson of freedom
Maharishi taught to us
Why does the TM-org rabidly
criticise Deepak Chopra and Sri Sri. Ravishankar.?? TM-governors claim
MMY called him "Sugar-Caned poison".??
I do not know, whether
Ravishankar od Deppak had been called so. But I guess it would preferredly fit
to Ravishankar. When I was living at Gandhinagar/India between October 18,
1997 and September 11, 2001 (!!!) I got in touch with Ravishankars "Art of
Living", and I watched a group of Government-employees practicing "Sudarshan
Kriya" (I hope I remember the name of this practice correctly). I was
shockked, ´because I heard them breathing "like horses" close to be collapsing
into a hyperventilative cramp. It sounded so unnatural and disharmonious to me
that I had the instant impulse to undertake something.
I wrote a letter to him
and got an answer from his secretary: In short the answer was (out of which
you can make out my own inquiry), that Ravishankar would be ready to let me
initiate "hundreds and thousands of his followers" provided a) I got an
authorisation from the TM-Movement to do so and b) that the TM-Movement
stopped to behave like a "fanatic muslim organization"- I was positively
shocked and tried to get in touch with the TM-movement. No reply. Ravishankar
also invited me to come to his place at Andhra Pradesh, but unfortunately I
became sick at that time (getting Malaria) and could not attend the planned
meeting. Later on I did not succeed in getting further in touch with him, only
seeing him on the Indian TV-Screen, where I felt his self-_expression_
really like "sugar-caned". His way of talking with a nonchalant voice,
reminded me to a plagiarism of Maharishi's typical self-_expression_. It had a
"sweetness" of someone, who obviously intended to ride on a fashionable wave,
trying to imitate his former master. (Similarly Nandkeshore always tried to
imitate Maharishi, which in a similar way sounded tweely and
apocryphal).
I
have to keep the appearance of the movement ridiculous. Those who are
able to think from the heart will yet join and be
with us."
What about those who Use their
Brains.??
Those who think from the
heart defintely use their brains. But I indirectly agree to you: Those who are
trying to use their brains
not always think from
their hearts.
But science on TM got obviously suppressed by CIA and other
conspiraceous groups.
How does the CIA suppress
Science.??
I am not totally in
picture of the genuine story. But once someone close to me reported that the
German Government got a serious warning from some American delegate not to
support the German TM-Movement anymore. Church and Government in joint effort
started a fatal campaign, which created an aversion in all schools against TM.
World-wide more and more voices came up to say that the movement is launching
pseudo-scientific explanations regarding their religious efforts in
order to pull people out of their cultural and religious heritages and
make them brain-washed and dependent. I cannot tell you how the CIA has been
doing it concretely. But it is for sure that you will hardly find the academic
recognition of Robert Keith Wallace's findings at Harvard Medical School in
the early Seventies, especially the clear defintion of a fourth state of
consciousness, which is unlike sleep, dreaming and waking state in scientific
literature. It is also a present scandal, why Governments are still not being
obliged to introduce "transcending" as a duty in education. People get forced
to get insufficiently educated, therefore by logic the Goverments should
also be in the position to get children enforced to regular practice of
transcendence.
be in the
position
Viktor
Schauberger from Austria similar like Tesslar had shown the way to get out of
dependence already in the Thirties (he was one of the fathers of
discovering the reality of "free
energy"). If we
had his technologies as part of our homes
What is
"Free Energy".??!! Please explain
Before I start to
elaborate on it, you better look under http://freeenergynews.com/ . Viktor Schauberger, Wilhelm Reich and
Nicolas Tesla have found out that there is an energy, which can be activated
by gentle methods, who unfold a mulitifold strength of powers than
conventional energies. Especially water seems to be a mystical element as
source of this energy. Schauberger as a forest warden watched the phenomenon
in the Thirties that trouts could stand still under water-falls like as if not
being bound to gravity anymore and he came to trend-setting results, which
later on let him be essential part of the first construction of a
jet-fighter and even construction of the so-called UFO-propulsion. The
allied forces after world-war second toook all his recordings under
seal.
There are not only
roomers but also serious hints, that research on these propulsive forces had
been continued in secrecy.
It might be worth to read
some book of Callum Coats, who has been doing 15 years research on
Schauberger's theories and practical approaches, which also can be applied as
rural technologies etc.
-------------------OriginalMessage------------------
From: "Hagen J. Holtz"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 13
Nov 2005 09:28:16 +0100
Subject:
[FairfieldLife] Earth turns around the sun not the other way: (How MMY sold a
diamond (TM) for a handful of spinach...)
>> > The way I heard the story,
it was the Shankaracharya, or the guy
>> MMY was
>> >
propping up as the Shankaracharya (I can't begin to keep the
>>
details of that
>> > whole mess straight) who suggested to MMY,
during a quick trip to
>> India
>> > during the Fiuggi
course, that he offer something more to the
>> Westerners.
So
>> > Maharishi pulled out a copy of the Yoga Sutras and began
>> experimenting on
>> > half a dozen of the M-group
types around him (I got this account
>> from one of
>> >
them).
This seems to be
mere speculation without argumentative basis. It is
the same way typically mystifying circumstances as you are claiming them
instead of as "to have been the cause of Maharishi's
decision".
The Siddhis are the logic
consequence out of TM. Look into the Samyama-principle: Dharana ("fixing"),
dhyana ("gliding") and samadhi ("landing"). These three parameters
(always) form the natural movement of the mind. The result is
"concentrating" (ekagrata parinama). In TM you start with fixing the mantra in
a repetitive manner. The emphasis is on dharana. Due to the three-guna
principle the result is samadhi. In the siddhis the fixing aspect is being put
into the back-ground. Emphasis is on dhyana ("coming back to the simplest form
of awareness" -= siddhi-instruction). By this you pass through samadhi and end
up in dharana (fixation = manifestation). This is pure applicable science of
mind.
The sidhis didn't come out until 1977.
The 1% effect came
>> out when
>> > Domash was reigning
physicist in 1974. There was a campaign in
> the
>> UK
in
>> > which one of the slogans was "you can be one of the 99 if
you can
>> get one of
>> > your friends to be the one."
Square root of 1% came out soon
> after
>> the
>>
> sidhis, and Domash or Hagelin was physicist at that point. It was
>> still
>> > Domash until about 1980. Anyway, I think
the theory preceded the
>> research.
Yes you think but you don't know it. And anyhow it would not
have made any difference: In Science either theory precedes experience or vice
versa. This is nothing unusual. Important is that later on theory and practice
or the other way round have to match this or that
way.
>> > In other words, the theory of 1% or
square root of 1% was bandied
>> about
>> > before any
societal testing was done. And Maharishi spent
> countless
>>
hours
>> > discussing this and lecturing about it. It's not like
it was
>> foisted on him
>> > by cunning physicists. As
always, he was calling the shots.
Was there any harm
in it ?
He
> was
>>
tickled
>> > pink to get a theory that would absolve him from
having to get
> 10%
>> of the
>> > world's
population meditating, or even 1%. Anyway, I don't think
>>
this
>> > particular point has much to do with the failure of the
movement.
For sure he was looking for some more efficient formula. But
this was just for principle reasons and has nothing to do with how
many people were meant to be practicing TM.
The failure of the movement is by the
way its present success. 99% of the TM-Teachers all over the world
have been leaving the movement. Many of them are still teaching. That is, what
Maharishi wanted. Because it secured that the secret agents in the movement
have no access anymore to destroy the movement. Their assumed success of
having been destroying now had become a success for Maharishi to have
made so many minds become independent, not anymore bound to the master. This
is the lesson of freedom Maharishi taught to us. He is always one step
ahead.
The ideal of 10,000 or so at one place can grow now from the
very grass root level. Once it has been established from there it will
never be destroyable anymore. Maharishi 1979 in Seelisberg: "I have to play a
global game, which you may not understand, but which will prevent the movement
from ultimate destruction. I have to keep the appearance of the movement
ridiculous. Those who are able to think from the heart will yet join and
be with us."
It is now up to us to organize and realize this ideal step
by step.
>> Although
>> > the advent of the sidhis sure
scared off a lot of respectable
> folks
>> who
were
>> > beginning to take it seriously.
What should these
folks have been taking more serious than the siddhis and scientific
research on TM ? All this sounds a bit talkative from your
end.
In order to reach
Kaivalya even the Karma Mimamsa Sutras and the Vedanta Sutras have to be
practiced according to the Samyama-Principle. Only under these circumstances
the Siddhis could unfold to full extent anyhow.
>>
>> Thanks Rick, for the History
lesson, I needed it. At any rate, it
>> really
>> supports
my contention that MMY has rested the entire welfare of
> the
>> TMorg's success on these bogus studies!!
There were no bogus
studies, there were only bogus interpretations (see those watery wisdoms in
the recent mail "Where is the truth ?", where pseudo-yogies are typically
misguiding people's minds, ending up in confusion like "everything is
truth").
It's psuedo-science, it
>> hasn't been proven
satisfactorily. Remember.."thru the window of
>> science".
There was nothing wrong
in that statement. But science on TM got obviously suppressed by CIA and
other conspiraceous groups. Why the fourth state of consciousness has not yet
been part of general physiology so far ?
We might as well replace Guru Dev's picture with that of
>> the greatest scientest of our age, the great John Hagelin!!
MMY's
>> biggest mistake was, is, and always will be, the Siddhi's
program!
The biggest mistake
is that people are obviously not practicing this program regularly, because it
is time-consuming, and money does not rain from the sky in order to allow a
man to invest so much time in that daily.
Viktor Schauberger
from Austria similar like Tesslar had shown the way to get out of dependence
already in the Thirties (he was one of the fathers of discovering
the reality of "free energy").
If we had his
technologies as part of our homes meanwhile, we all would find more time to
excercise the siddhis regularly.
>>
>
>
> Unless you happen to find the Siddhis program of personal use, of
> course...
I definitely find
it of personal use. Don't critizize the master so much, change and
deepen your vision !
Hagen
