"Consciousness can only become more subtle and refined and that is what happens 
after death." 

 You reckon no one here can logically beat this? This is crap for a start, 
seems like it's the killer punch to its own credibility. 
 

 But the rest of it is interesting if you like that sort of thing, but seems to 
have been caused by the problem of the brain not being able to see how it works 
by looking at itself. That's why we think there are two things going on in 
there when they are really aspects of the same thing and I don't see how we can 
have one without the other. You'll tie yourself in knots trying to turn round 
fast enough to see how the mind pulls off the trick, maybe you'll go crazy and 
think there's some sort of eternal aspect to our selves that is beyond our 
understanding. It sure seems like that but then I fall asleep and the illusion 
(however it works) disappears. That's what fuels all this speculation, the fact 
we can't imagine not being here.
 

 If you put it all into an evolutionary perspective you lose all the mystical 
confusion by realising the whole thing has been added to and refined but that 
type of refining (jn fact the only type) is always a bodge-up there isn't a 
single part of our bodies that works as well as it would if it had been 
designed and I see no reason why the brain should be different. But people 
don't like thinking about it like that, it collapses the wave form away from us 
being some sort of mystically superior being. But we could probably work out 
quite easily what previous life forms would have had upstairs, the only 
difference between us and them is this ability to create endless metaphors. So 
it's all constructs really, and it's the constructs that are aware of 
themselves even if they never come to a conclusion about how they work. The 
problem here is the metaphors taking themselves too seriously.
 

 You probably think that's ducking the question but it's just avoiding getting 
pulled into the endless cycle of ever more mysterious sophistry. We won't work 
it out how minds work from the inside, at least no one ever has, so it's 
probably be a good idea to hang five and work out how it's all actually put 
together and start again from there.
 

---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote :

 noozguru wrote :  "Close your eyes and tells us where your awareness ends." 

 Every time I write about this stuff I get just a bit more able to keep to the 
central issues.  So on that level, I thank you for the reply.

Awareness is not consciousness.  You, above, used the word "your" as if my ego 
(or my nervous system,  my mind, my brain and/or my Being -- take your pick) 
had some sort of natural right to "own" awareness as if "it" were some sort of 
personal "thing" over which I would have some sort of hegemony.  BAH!  
Awareness is beyond beginnings and endings -- it's not a dimensional thing or 
"it" or whatever -- if you have a category, piss off, awareness is beyond it no 
matter what.  

Whatever my mind is able to do is a product of my nervous system -- NOT 
AWARENESS.  
Compare:  Awareness "is"  beyond the "does or does not;" whereas, mind is a 
processing of, what?, billions of chemical operations per "thought?"  THAT'S 
NOT AWARENESS. 

Awareness is not a doing or non-doing.  It's not an "it."  It's not in or out 
of existence.  That which is aware is awareness solely -- consciousness merely 
attempts to chemically embody and internally structure itself to symbolize 
awareness -- this is labeled "I am."  If a thought comes, "I am" changes to "I 
am that thought."  That's consciousness pretending it is sentient.  BAH.  
Consciousness is an identity whore.  The monkey  who will jump to any branch -- 
that's the Ved symbol for how the mind attends to its processes -- NOT how 
awareness or identity is "changing  or moving or whatever." 
 

 Awareness is beyond isness and isnotness. Consciousness (Being) is all about 
parochial expression in a nervous system.  (I'm willing to grant that maybe the 
universe is a giant nervous system and that that would be the foundation of our 
understanding of the term, "universal consciousness." 
 

 Remember, I'm not the person saying this shit.  I'm merely reporting Advaita 
axioms -- why? -- because I think we'd all be edified to see this CRUCIAL 
difference between these two concepts of awareness and consciousness.  The 
concept, awareness, is merely a place holder for "we don't have a way to 
conceptualize this non-this non-thingy thingy."  

Had enough of me?  Don't blame you, so here's Nisargadatta -- who was the real 
deal as far as I can tell from my many years of reading his shit.  But what 
would I know?  One thing I bet is that no one here can best his logic about the 
present issue.

Here:

"Maharaj: The present 'I am' is as false as the 'I was' and 'I shall be'. It is 
merely an idea in the mind, an impression left by memory, and the separate 
identity it creates is false.
 This habit of referring to a false centre must be done away with, the notion 
'I see', 'I feel', 'I think', 'I do', must disappear from the field of 
consciousness; what remains when the false is no more, is real."


and:
 

   "There can be no transition from consciousness to awareness, for awareness 
is not a form of consciousness. Consciousness can only become more subtle and 
refined and that is what happens after death. As the various vehicles of man 
die off, the modes of consciousness induced by them also fade away."



 

---In [email protected], <noozguru@...> wrote :

 Close your eyes and tells us where your awareness ends.
 
 On 12/15/2014 01:59 PM, Duveyoung wrote:
 
   What the fuck's with youse guys -- I post a few comic blurbs about awareness 
not being consciousness, and all I get is "you're a putz" and "age?"
 
 How very fucking indecent of you -- those are two  INHUMAN responses.  Utterly 
void of good intent.
 
 These are your fucking personalities? -- this is what you get up with in the 
morning?  You life is funzies only if you're able to maliciously heap up on 
someone with a strong opinion where you have, it seems, killed that area of 
your brains that could support that opinion? -- with previously indulged in 
hate, anger, life-long recriminations of failure? -- WHAT?  
 
 HOLY FUCK, HOW MISERABLE ARE YOU?  
 

 It's shit like those responses that ENCOURAGE Willy etc.  He's just too stupid 
to mount up to your level of smarm.  That makes you his mentor.
 
 Have either of you two ever tried to get ONE TRUTH explicated, deconstructed, 
approached, hinted at? -- anything you can brag about having brought to this 
community that is, you know, SPIRITUALLY WORTH ANYONE'S NOTICE?   
 
 "Awareness is not consciousness." That's fucking gold. That could be the start 
of ten thousand good conversations.  What have you brought to this community 
that has this clarifying power?
 
 Fuck your history, your celebrity name dropping, your travel shit, your 
computers-honcho shit, your astrology shit, your Sanskrit shit, your tantra 
shit, -- NAME ONE THING TRUE YOU'VE CHAMPIONED that has any value in helping 
other here gain clarity about the human condition.  At best you're parroting 
other opinions instead of trying to ferret out the truth with the minds that 
come here every day and willing to do that spade work.
 
 You're both a couple of righteous ass pricks as far as your actions here go.  
Snobs.   But your're nothing-known-very-well snobs -- the worse kind.  At best, 
you're C+ personalities.  You're whistling past the graveyard on most topics -- 
afraid you'll be found lacking.  
 
 I admit my many difficulties arriving at clarity, but you two strut around 
here like you're on some sort of stilts,  and you do so when there's folks here 
that outrank you in every way possible: spiritual, psychological, sociological, 
career-wise, money-wise, IQ-wise, heart-wise, education-wise, 
world-experience-wise, and on and on, and you two just are the spitball champs 
snickering in the back of the class.
 
 It's low.  It's small.  It's not gunna get ya into a high heaven.
 
 And worst of all, your spitballs are pathetic -- you don't even have a Don 
Rickles funny-side to your posts -- no bite, no irony, no satire -- all we get 
from you two is a total lack of creativity in every single post I've ever read 
of yours -- and I read almost all of them.  You both stink of ego that's been 
hardened into a sour POV that's just not going to get straightened out in the 
life left to you.  Sucks, eh?
 


 



  


 

---In [email protected], <noozguru@...> wrote :

 Close your eyes and tells us where your awareness ends.
 
 On 12/15/2014 01:59 PM, Duveyoung wrote:
 
   What the fuck's with youse guys -- I post a few comic blurbs about awareness 
not being consciousness, and all I get is "you're a putz" and "age?"
 
 How very fucking indecent of you -- those are two  INHUMAN responses.  Utterly 
void of good intent.
 
 These are your fucking personalities? -- this is what you get up with in the 
morning?  You life is funzies only if you're able to maliciously heap up on 
someone with a strong opinion where you have, it seems, killed that area of 
your brains that could support that opinion? -- with previously indulged in 
hate, anger, life-long recriminations of failure? -- WHAT?  
 
 HOLY FUCK, HOW MISERABLE ARE YOU?  
 

 It's shit like those responses that ENCOURAGE Willy etc.  He's just too stupid 
to mount up to your level of smarm.  That makes you his mentor.
 
 Have either of you two ever tried to get ONE TRUTH explicated, deconstructed, 
approached, hinted at? -- anything you can brag about having brought to this 
community that is, you know, SPIRITUALLY WORTH ANYONE'S NOTICE?   
 
 "Awareness is not consciousness." That's fucking gold. That could be the start 
of ten thousand good conversations.  What have you brought to this community 
that has this clarifying power?
 
 Fuck your history, your celebrity name dropping, your travel shit, your 
computers-honcho shit, your astrology shit, your Sanskrit shit, your tantra 
shit, -- NAME ONE THING TRUE YOU'VE CHAMPIONED that has any value in helping 
other here gain clarity about the human condition.  At best you're parroting 
other opinions instead of trying to ferret out the truth with the minds that 
come here every day and willing to do that spade work.
 
 You're both a couple of righteous ass pricks as far as your actions here go.  
Snobs.   But your're nothing-known-very-well snobs -- the worse kind.  At best, 
you're C+ personalities.  You're whistling past the graveyard on most topics -- 
afraid you'll be found lacking.  
 
 I admit my many difficulties arriving at clarity, but you two strut around 
here like you're on some sort of stilts,  and you do so when there's folks here 
that outrank you in every way possible: spiritual, psychological, sociological, 
career-wise, money-wise, IQ-wise, heart-wise, education-wise, 
world-experience-wise, and on and on, and you two just are the spitball champs 
snickering in the back of the class.
 
 It's low.  It's small.  It's not gunna get ya into a high heaven.
 
 And worst of all, your spitballs are pathetic -- you don't even have a Don 
Rickles funny-side to your posts -- no bite, no irony, no satire -- all we get 
from you two is a total lack of creativity in every single post I've ever read 
of yours -- and I read almost all of them.  You both stink of ego that's been 
hardened into a sour POV that's just not going to get straightened out in the 
life left to you.  Sucks, eh?
 


 






Reply via email to