Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fourth?

[Vaj]

On Nov 22, 2005, at 2:56 AM, cardemaister wrote: You should read Taimni's comment on II 52 where he explains his view why "tataH kSiiyate prakaashaavaraNam" obviously does not refer to the same "light" (prakaasha) as "...tataH  prakaashaavaraNa (prakaasha + aavaraNa)-kSayaH." (The forms "aavaraNa" and "aavaraNam" are not different from each other semantically. In compounds words, save the last one, are used in the stem form without the indicators of gender and inflectional paradigms, and stuff.) My understanding is what is being uncovered is the sattva of buddhi, i.e. the light of discrimination itself. Then viveka-jnana can come forth--transcendental discrimination. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.