Monsanto was started by an idealistic scientist who thought he could keep the world from starving. Then his marketing department got a hold on things and now it's all about making money, not helping feed the world.

Keep in mind that Monsanto started out almost a century ago when no one would have imagined that every individual on earth including farmers might have a computer or two or three. Computerized farming can allow crops to be raised naturally. Monsanto is obsolete and needs to be deprecated.

On 02/22/2015 11:39 AM, [email protected] [FairfieldLife] wrote:



Lack of diversity can kill us. Any form of monoculture is
dangerous. Nature uses diversity as an insurance to ensure
that species survive capricious environmental changes and
diseases.

Scientists say that the Irish potato famine was caused by
monoculture.

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/agriculture
_02 <http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/agriculture_02>


--- <anartaxius@...> wrote :

Even hybrid seed producers use a tactic of creating seeds that do not perform well if the seeds from the crop are used, protecting their investment. The problem with poorer countries with GMO crops is just this — sharing seeds, or using seeds harvested from GMO crops. However GMO seeds from GMO crops are used under license. Monsanto says they have sued 147 farmers out of 325,000 customers in the United States for patent infringement. I personally think GMO crops could have potential dangers, but the TMO doesn't want them because they want to sell their mumbo-jumbo farming techniques, which so far do not seem to have any kind of scientific track record for improved yield or food quality or cost benefits over conventional organic farming techniques.

I also think lack of diversity will be a big problem. This happened even before GMO technology, or even hybridising crops because we select what we like to eat and want to grow it without a lot of trouble.



--- <noozguru@...> wrote :

Thing is companies do this genetic modification because they are desperate for making money. And if they don't do it then someone else will and then their stockholders will be in an uproar. The real beast is capitalism.

--- <salyavin808@...> wrote :

Exactly. I think the thing that worries me most about GMO's is that the world food supply ends up in the hands of bio-tech companies. Farmers in the third world have already been sued for sharing last years seeds among themselves rather than buying new ones from the manufacturer, along with the pesticides they are designed to work with.

Keeping food strains strong via interbreeding by sharing seeds will be a thing of the past in our brave new monoculture world.


On 02/16/2015 11:33 AM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@... <mailto:anartaxius@...> [FairfieldLife] wrote:

        They modified the plant to stop producing an enzyme that makes
        the apple to turn brown. Just think, if we could do that to
        people, we could stop discrimination based on skin colour. I
        would not worry though, humans are exceptionally creative in
        finding things for disliking other people. There are many ways
        to produce 'new' organisms. With genetic engineering one can
        mimic things like cross breeding, or (and this is where the
        real potential for danger comes in) mimic natural mutation, or
        inserting genes from other species, or creating entirely
        synthetic genes. I think a glow in the dark 'spiritual' gene
        that activates when a person believes a spiritual philosophy
        with too great a percentage of gullibility would help identify
        people one might want to avoid, as the conversation with such
        would tend to be repetitive without progress. Not of much use
        here though.


        *From:* "Bhairitu noozguru@... <mailto:noozguru@...>
        [FairfieldLife]" <[email protected]>
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        *To:* [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        *Sent:* Monday, February 16, 2015 5:37 PM
        *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Oh great! GMO apples approved for
        growing in the US

        Just what you've been waiting for: an apple that doesn't turn
        brown.
        GMO labeling needs to be federally mandated.

        
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/14/business/gmo-apples-are-approved-for-growing-in-us.html?_r=1






Reply via email to