Anyone who takes this discussion seriously is experiencing cognitive dissonance - this forum is a joke. This is a case in point: the informants don't call her The Corrector for no reason. That's what an online discussion group is for. It's a Potemkin village all the way down.
--In [email protected], <mjackson74@...> wrote : Judy is obviously a control freak - who else would try to correct the most minute detail of other people's posts? ---In [email protected], <authfriend@...> wrote : You have to be kidding me. If someone made a post with a bunch of factual misrepresentations about you in an attempt to paint you in an unflattering light, I suspect you'd speak up to correct them too. And exactly, what good would that do? I've been the target of insults for a decade but I'm not going to go bat-shit crazy over a newsgroup message. So far, there's been many clear cases of cognitive dissonance displayed in this thread. It's not complicated. At it's core it is a debate about posting satire to the group, or not. In fact, before you realized that Willytex was a nonentity This is clearly a case of cognitive dissonance - you do realize you're talking to an alias, right? whose trolling was largely ignored, So, it's all abut "Willytex". you screamed bloody murder at his lies about you. It was just a joke that I posted - about baking pot-cookies in the MIU campus kitchen. So, I confess I really don't know who is responsible for doing that, all I know is what MJ said about the rampant drug use on campus, so I made a funny. According to what I've heard, the problem was not the pot, but that they didn't put enough in the brownies. LoL! How MJ would be knowing anything about any campus drug use is beyond me. Go figure. Are campus staff members supposed to be fraternizing with the international students at MUM?
