Salyavin, My comments are shown in italics below:
---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote : ---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote : ---In [email protected], <jr_esq@...> wrote : It's because of the Fermi Paradox, as explained in this video: The Fermi Paradox actually asks the question of why, if there are loads of other sentient beings, haven't we been visited or even picked up a reliable signal from one? This video doesn't really answer the question because there are so many billions of planets in our galaxy alone. You'd think that of the great many planets visible to us was inhabited, some life form might have escaped and colonised the place. Fermi never really expected to come across extra-galactic aliens. There are trillions and trillions of habitable planets — why haven’t we encountered aliens yet? http://www.salon.com/2015/05/06/there_are_trillions_and_trillions_of_habitable_planets_why_havent_we_encountered_aliens_yet/ http://www.salon.com/2015/05/06/there_are_trillions_and_trillions_of_habitable_planets_why_havent_we_encountered_aliens_yet/ There are trillions and trillions of habitable planets —... http://www.salon.com/2015/05/06/there_are_trillions_and_trillions_of_habitable_planets_why_havent_we_encountered_aliens_yet/ A new video from design collective Kurz Gesagt explains the Fermi paradox VIDEO View on www.salon.com http://www.salon.com/2015/05/06/there_are_trillions_and_trillions_of_habitable_planets_why_havent_we_encountered_aliens_yet/ Preview by Yahoo But, from a philosophical point of view, the planets, stars and galaxies that we see are forms of consciousness with varying classes and varieties. In some sense, these cosmological entities are part of us in terms of consciousness. MMY stated that the universe is in our brains and physiology. And what a miserably pointless philosophy it is. It answers no questions, can make no predictions and provides us with no answers. And it doesn't even make sense in any physical way. Actually, some of the vedic principles are stating the same ideas that the Judeo-Christian tradition has been saying. For example, the concept of the Samhita between the Rishi-Devata-Chandas is the same as the idea of Elohim in the Torah, and the Holy Trinity in Christianity. This concept can clearly be seen by understanding the principles of jyotish. For example, certain sectors of the zodiac or the universe refer to our head, heart and feet. More specifically, certain parts of the universe refer to specific parts of the brain, such as the left and right portion of the brain, the cerebellum, et cetera. So astrologers think the universe refers to our heads and feet. Einstein sure missed something important... I believe jyotish is still providing new scientific insights that scientists are currently researching. Specifically, some scientists are thinking that the universe operates like the principles of a hologram. This idea is already inherent in studying the birth chart of the person. In other words, the configuration of the planets at the time of birth reflect the physical and mental makeup of the person in real life. Unfortunately, the astronomers and scientists have limited their definition of ETs. They're so stupid. Instead of spending all that time, money and ingenuity trying to probe the far reaches of space they could have just watched a lecture on TM and vedic "science" and got all their questions answered - albeit answered very badly... ...in fact, so badly the only way they have of testing the answer is by refering back to the theory itself and deciding that it must be right because they decided it was true. The world is flat so there's no need to look for evidence to the contrary. But if you ever did... We recently had a prime example of the poor predictive ability of vedic "science". When the LHC at CERN was built the primary purpose was to find the Higg's Boson, which would give a fundamental clue to the problem of how things in the universe have mass. If vedic "science" was really a science then it's claim to explain all of both manifest and unmanifest creation could have been put to the test by John Hagelin - guided by Marshy of course - with a prediction about the giga-electron voltage weight of the Higgs. Which was a mystery before it was discovered. But they made no predictions and, I suspect, they could not have done as anything that appears in your consciousness, however profound it might seem to you, is a mere idea and not revealed wisdom from some super-aware realm we are supposed to be a part of. In fact, John Hagelin was disappointed with the results from CERN, saying that with the Higgs at the weight it is there couldn't be any unification beyond the electro-weak level. Which means no grand unification and also no unified field. Sorry "Buck". You'd think they would have pulped a few books and amended the posters at MUM in light of this new information by now, but no. As I say, this isn't science. Any scientist would have to admit they are wrong and start again. When the facts don't fit the theory, the theory must be w As mentioned in one of his books, MMY mentioned the concept of a quantum wave function that created the entire universe. At the same time, this wave function can be accessed by our own brain by reaching pure consciousness. However, there are some scientists who are misled by stating that consciousness is an emergent phenomenon of matter. How foolish can you get?
