The key word of John Jrs query was "philosophical". In fact, thoughts and ideas are not physical at all - you can't even prove there's not a rhinoceros in the room. Without consciousness, there would be no sound of a tree falling in the forest. Go figure. ---In [email protected], <jr_esq@...> wrote :
But, from a philosophical point of view, the planets, stars and galaxies that we see are forms of consciousness with varying classes and varieties. In some sense, these cosmological entities are part of us in terms of consciousness. MMY stated that the universe is in our brains and physiology. ---In [email protected], <turquoiseb@...> wrote : Don't be ridiculous. That last sentence only applies to <spit> scientific fields of study, not spiritual ones. Everyone knows that none of Maharishi's theories were ever wrong. They actually *couldn't* be wrong, because he was functioning at the level of the Laws of Nature themselves. So if facts *seemed* not to prove one of his theories true, there has to be something wrong with the "facts." Someone gathered the wrong ones. Either that, or science is just too gross to measure the *real* facts. Yeah, that's the ticket. :-) ---In [email protected], <jr_esq@...> wrote : Pastor Barry, Please, give a specific example in real life that typifies the idea you are presenting. We look forward to reading his work, scientific, spiritual or otherwise.
