From: "[email protected] [FairfieldLife]" <[email protected]>

...For example there is a wide range of intelligence here. Now somebody, we are 
not saying who, must be the stupidest person on FFL, though in all fairness, 
they may have all moved over to The Peak, that phallic symbol pointing up into 
the sky. Once we discover the stupidest person here, one of us, or several of 
us need to attack that person's 'person', their ego, by implying directly and 
forcefully they are in fact, not just in surmise, the stupidest person on FFL. 
Then, Doug has to determine if the stupidest person here person has been 
sufficiently maligned to warrant action against the violator for having pointed 
out a simple fact. 

Interesting. You certainly make a good case for how difficult Doug's job will 
be. 

Just riffing on this theoretical scenario, Anartaxius, do you think it would be 
easier for Doug to make such a Solomon-like decision if the person who had been 
named as the stupidest person on FFL had made eight posts just in the two days 
since Doug was made moderator, *each* of them violating the Yahoo Guidelines in 
some way?

  

Reply via email to