Old loss of group, connection, and brotherhood..
 415559Re: Yahoo Groups-Guidelines, Civility, Cohesion, and FFL 
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/414799
 
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/415559 
Yes, in their long loss of group, connection and brotherhood of what evidently 
was formative in their lives one can empathize by this social-psychological 
perspective with some of our old TM'ers frequenting FFL and their behaviors. 
Folks who once had formative community in TM but are now out away from their 
heady days of old as they evidently use FFL in means to find what was a lost 
powerful connection and brotherhood in life. It is sad and pitiable when you 
look at it this way. -JaiGuruYou 

 

---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote :

 Yep, and evidently like larger civil society often needs to pull together to 
protect itself and everyone from lawlessness and asocial criminal gangs it is a 
lot like Rick needs to be present at times here protecting and enforcing the 
civility of the larger open forum of FFL as a communal yahoo-group.   
 

---In [email protected], <richard@...> wrote :

 
 “You came into this world with nothing and you’ll leave this world with 
nothing.” - Don Draper

---In [email protected], <dhamiltony2k5@...> wrote :

 The loss of TM as group, not unlike where in a group 'connection' in a level 
of 'Brotherhood', there is a mutual agreement that one will put the welfare and 
safety of the group above your own in a level of 'Brotherhood', putting the 
welfare of the group above your own..  At a time there was that in TM, as by 
example like portrayed in some classics like the Iliad, in WWII for some, for 
some young Marines bonding in Afghanistan or in Fallujah coming in to a bond in 
a small group of trust who they may come to love more than themselves.    

---In [email protected], <dhamiltony2k5@...> wrote :

 Some leaving from that level of a communal brotherhood then, separated going 
out and coming back in to society as an individual without a ready bond of 
group one may not know who to trust. One can imagine the psychological distress 
for some people when they leave something like this level of connection within 
group that they loved for a time. It can be an exercise for some depending on 
personal resources.      

---In [email protected], <dhamiltony2k5@...> wrote :

 Coping then with a loss of a level of communal 'brotherhood' for those being 
turned out in larger society like happened at a time with some old TM'ers, then 
places like yahoo-groups tries in form to offer a resting place for folks to 
come together within accepting groups guidelines. Some people evidently do 
groups better than others, how then to bring diverse peoples back in to a 
larger civil group context though? The yahoo-groups guidelines as a template 
are a thoughtful attempt at the exercise of group civility and cohesion. 
Evidently in coming in to cohesion it takes both a personal and group 
constitution in self-control, and hence a discipline and moderation by the 
individual and the group to be of benefit to the individual or the group.    

---In FairfieldLife@, <dhamiltony2k5@...> wrote :

 This Reverse Archery guy writing here must be a cousin of Rick Archer's, he 
seems pretty reasonable. Turqb is proly not all bad as a person. One can kind 
of understand some of these old TM'ers here in frequenting FFL the way they do 
yet looking for community as they once had. That communal something, that 
brotherhood that they had during their formative heady days of youth whence TM 
was coming in to its own back in the 60's and 70's. Those were powerful times 
in camaraderie, something that some people may not ascend to have in their 
lives like that at all. There are few environments or careers that produce or 
give that level of feeling of purpose and communal connectedness.   
 

---In [email protected], <dhamiltony2k5@...> wrote :

 A lot of old TM'ers like several here on FFL as they formatively 'came of age' 
it was back in the heady days of TM in the 60's and 70's. At a time that may 
have been one of those more powerful times of community for some in their whole 
lives. Some people in their early lives may never really have a cultivated 
experience of community, of navigating a healthy bonded group experience, like 
army brats that get moved frequently around in their youth may miss out on this 
in those formative years. TM for some may well have been that most powerful 
experience of group community, of brotherhood in anything. Seeing this or 
making note of it I feel makes sympathetic characters of several people you see 
in TM or here on FFL.  -JaiGuruYou     
 

---In [email protected], <reverse_archery@...> wrote :

 
 

---In [email protected], <curtisdeltablues@...> wrote :

 ---In [email protected], <reverse_archery@...> wrote :
 
 
 From Jim: 
 

 Thanks for clearing that up, Curtis. I apologize for assuming it was you. 
Whoever it was, I am glad they are gone, and given what you have to say below, 
please don't trip over yourself, trying to join The Peak. Perhaps you and Barry 
can start your own forum - Best of luck!

Me:
Could have been cleared up before the accusation was posted, but better late 
than never. You got your dig in on me even though it was manufactured, and now 
the retraction can be posted on page 17 near the garden club announcements. Oh 
well, Internet life..

Jim: 
 Oh, its not all fluff over there. Here's a piece I wrote about Barry 
yesterday. Enjoy!
 

 "Ha! What nonsense from him. I remember about ten years ago, interacting with 
Barry, and he was a different person. But, when I recognized around that time, 
that my experience and my life were meeting the criteria for spiritual 
liberation, or enlightenment, and decided to come out of the closet about it on 
FFL, he kinda flipped out, and hasn’t been the same since. 

 In evaluating what he has to say, regarding these endless rants against TM, it 
suddenly occurred to me that if I were to compare Barry’s REAL life, against 
mine and those in my social circle, he has accomplished very little. He strikes 
me as someone who has lived so much of his life in a spiritual cocoon, and 
wearing his ‘anti-cult’ glasses, now spreads the warning *of his own 
experience* tirelessly, not realizing that most of us, certainly everyone I 
know, has managed to simply elude the snares he rails against incessantly.
 

 His life’s reality, focused unerringly on turning others away from the 
spiritual dependency he lived for decades, is so tiny, so restricted, so 
unsuccessful, compared to the life I live, it becomes something very much about 
Barry, but with little relevance to me. He has made up his mind long ago about 
those who have faithfully practiced TM, and the notion that someone has 
accomplished the goal, in spite of his judgments and assumptions, drives him 
mad. It is just not at all my problem, and something he will have to resolve on 
his own. Or not. :-)"



 
 













 

 

 

  




Reply via email to