And here I thought your criteria was whether someone could write a
graduate level academic essay as a post. You must have grown up in an
academic environment. And the TMO wouldn't have helped because they
seemed to be able to publish something that could be explained in a
paragraph or two if it could be several pages long instead. :-D
On 06/13/2015 06:09 AM, [email protected] [FairfieldLife] wrote:
Intelligence Quotient (IQ) as determined by the Wechsler Adult
Intelligence Scale. That should be sufficient. Can you give me a
recent example where I asked someone to define a term? I don't recall
doing this 'frequently' but also my memory is not particularly good at
this stage in my life. If you cannot do that we can consider this post
trolling. If you first establish the fact, then you can wonder why,
and perhaps I will give an answer.
---In [email protected], <authfriend@...> wrote :
I note that while you frequently demand that other people define their
terms, you have not been willing to define "stupidest" (and now
"smartest") that you've been harping on recently. Why would that be, I
wonder?
---In [email protected], <anartaxius@...> wrote :
I was not around today, but we want to keep FFL. My suggestion was
only at the potential heels of despotic moderation of FFL. Those who
dislike this site as it is now could think of going over to The Peak,
as it was expressly created to avoid this place as it is now. People
stay here because it is more intellectually stimulating, in spite of
the fact there is one person here that is stupider than all the
others. The 'stupidest person' here is really a symbol, like that of
the 'unknown soldier', it expresses a principle, not a personality.
There is also the smartest person here, but he/she has not posted in a
while, and it's not me, it's not Barry, it's not Judy, and ! it
certainly was not Robin. Perhaps that is a figment of my imagination,
but someone in a group is always the brightest star in the heavens.
