--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" 
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > > wrote:
> > snippage> 
> > > > My experience has been that as a born English speaker I 
found 
> > > > no subtle confusion when very young being introduced to a 
> > > > language of the country I was in. For example, learning 
Spanish 
> > > > in Mexico, because I heard and spoke both languages daily. I 
> > > > also rapidly forgot the non-English language after leaving 
its 
> > > > country of origin.
> > > 
> > > The question in my mind is whether the confusion MMY
> > > is talking about is on such a subtle level that you
> > > *wouldn't* detect it as such--the point being that we
> > > really don't know what he's referring to.
> > 
> > I mean no disrespect to him or to you, but if it is that subtle, 
> > from a practical standpoint, who cares?
> 
> Sure, obviously it's an individual decision whether
> you want to worry about it on the basis of something
> MMY has said.  I'm not advocating either way, and for
> all I know MMY could be completely wrong about it.
> 
> I'm just saying that on the basis of what very little
> we know, it's not impossible that something could
> get screwed up on a very subtle level that would have
> some negative impact on grosser levels without the person
> necessarily being able to make the connection, or even
> realizing there had *been* a screwup.  And if so, it
> might be something you'd want to avoid if you could,
> even if it did mean sacrificing some degree of ease
> of learning a second language as a tradeoff.
> 
> Again, all I'm saying is that we can't rule this
> possibility out without knowing more about what MMY
> means.  I'm not suggesting anybody even worry about
> it if they don't feel it's worth it.  Just pointing
> out that the original conclusion that MMY can't be
> trusted with children's education in this regard 
> isn't warranted on the basis of what information we
> have.
> 
> There's just this knee-jerk kind of reaction that
> many here have, that if something MMY says doesn't
> immediately make perfect sense to us on its face,
> therefore it must be crazy and wrong.  Maybe it is
> and maybe it isn't, but often the assumption is
> made on a very superficial basis.
> 
> That's really all I'm getting at.
> 
Oh OK. Yes, I agree with you.





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Need Help?  Get Help! Tools and Strategies for Healthy Drug-Free Living</a>.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/wI.OUB/dbOLAA/d1hLAA/0NYolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Reply via email to