By the science and we know this by experience too, TM’ers should show up.  
 

 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <dhamiltony...@yahoo.com> wrote :

 Yep.  TM’ers should loosen up, reach out and show up for communal meditations, 
like a duty.  
 


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <olliesed...@yahoo.com> wrote :

 I agree that TM along with any other valid breakthrough is going to attract 
those hoping to be a big frog in a small pond.  

 But no need to overlook that TM is also the most effective technique in 
promoting the entire cycle of higher states of consciousness, in a systematic 
way. There is no other technique available to the masses today that is even 
close. So, sure, watch against hubris, but no need for equivocation or false 
modesty towards TM, as it is unique in its attributes and effects, compared to 
the vast array of spiritual products available today. 

 However as for collective meditation, even as Maharishi called for a 
collection of the various disciplines in asking the sadhus of the valley of the 
saints to come together for a collective practice in a time of extreme world 
conflict, the indicia of modern science does seem to show that bringing 
transcendence to a population by supplying experienced meditators has an 
overall beneficial effect. 

 

 

 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <awoelflebater@...> wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Bingo! You also have that problem within the TM community. Everybody telling 
others what they *should or shouldn't * do and *oh, Maharishi wouldn't want 
that* syndrome(as if they were more enlightened and in tune with him).
 

 It seems to be essential for most people to be able to count themselves extra 
special or extra smart or extra privileged in some way. If that means their 
particular meditation technique is the greatest or that the particular country 
club they belong to is the most prestigious then that is how they play it. Most 
of us like to feel a bit exceptional in some way, and we probably are but not 
in the ways we think we are!
 
 


 From: "'Rick Archer' rick@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 7:26 AM
 Subject: RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Activist Meditators and A day of silent 
prayer ..Meditation 's Going Mainstream
 
 
   
 Spiritually immature people in a lot of groups behave like this. “Our 
technique/teacher/etc. is the bestest!” It’s an ego-booster. “It must be the 
best because if it weren’t I wouldn’t be doing it, because I’m so discerning 
and wise.”
  
 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 7:05 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Activist Meditators and A day of silent prayer 
..Meditation 's Going Mainstream


  
  
 Yeah, TM’ers do seem to contend a fight over meditations.  The antagonism with 
the other practices begins right away in the TM intro lectures.  Seems a 
marketing device employed on or by TM'ers.  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<mdixon.6569@... mailto:mdixon.6569@...> wrote :
 TM teachers are persnickety because Maharishi was when he was training 
teachers. He always drove home the difference between TM and other techniques

  when asked about them. He was *faulting* the other techniques and explained 
why TM was *better*. This is fine when you're teaching teachers. However, good 
manner s dictates you don't take that attitude when in *mixed* company. I don't 
recall M doing that when he was in the company of another teacher...run the 
other guys meditation down and build his up.

 As I said earlier, can TM'ers know when to not run the other guys meditation 
down in order to look superior.


 
 From: "dhamiltony2k5@... [FairfieldLife] 
mailto:dhamiltony2k5@...%20[FairfieldLife]"; <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 5:15 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Activist Meditators and A day of silent prayer 
..Meditation 's Going Mainstream

  
  
 But why are TM’ers so persnickety?  Among old Quakers those members who were 
well established in the transcendent, noticeably as those who could sit with 
and settle a meeting by their presence, were referred to as ‘weighty’ friends 
to meditate with.   TM’ers instead can come across as spiritually arrogant and 
exclusive.   
 

 Yet, Patanjali seems to indicate in his discussions of combining dharana, 
dhyan and samadhi in meditation is like the aggregate of focus in the 
TM-siddhis or in that last technique Maharishi was working on, the Ved and 
Physiology practice that combines attention and intention (very much like some 
buddhistic practice) with samadhi/transcendence.  
 

 TM’ers could adopt a more helpful attitude and show up for some of these 
collective meditations with others.  Like reaching out and lending a hand. It 
seems a cultural problem as much as anything that TM’ers may have which turns 
to shunning others.   -JaiGuruYou

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<mdixon.6569@... mailto:mdixon.6569@...> wrote :
 Doug, I guess the big question is, can TMers keep from telling other 
meditators how superior TM is over any other technique. If not, I would 
recommend they not attend because it will end up causing more tension..
  

 
 From: "dhamiltony2k5@... [FairfieldLife] 
mailto:dhamiltony2k5@...%20[FairfieldLife]"; <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 9:26 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Activist Meditators and A day of silent prayer 
..Meditation 's Going Mainstream

  
  
  Maharishi said that the world today needed the intercession of the saints who 
are established in themselves and are therefore, nearer to the almighty power.

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<dhamiltony2k5@... mailto:dhamiltony2k5@...> wrote :
 Should TM’ers condescend to send in support a group of meditators to help?

  

 The Contemplative Prayer and Reflection Group in Burlington will host a Day of 
Silent Prayer from 9:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. Saturday at Christ Episcopal Church, 
and everyone is welcome.  There’s never a bad day for prayer.

  

 People are welcome to drop in or out as they choose.

 Those arriving late are asked to enter quietly.

  

 The science on people joining in collective meditation

 would indicate a priority in joining groups to meditate. 

  

  


 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<dhamiltony2k5@... mailto:dhamiltony2k5@...> wrote :
 The secular approach to meditation is opening a lot of doors right now when it 
comes to brain health and stress relief,
  

 Meditation has been around for more than 2,500 years, but it has taken a 
secular approach and scientific research — not to mention added publicity from 
technology companies like Google and Apple, which encourage employees to 
meditate — to reintroduce it into popular culture. But can meditation, and its 
cousin, “mindfulness,” become staples of urban life the way that yoga, a rarity 
until the early 1990s, has become a widespread activity?



  

  

 No Texts, Please, We’re Meditating 
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/20/nyregion/no-texts-please-were-meditating.html?emc=eta1
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/20/nyregion/no-texts-please-were-meditating.html?emc=eta1
 No Texts, Please, We’re Meditating 
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/20/nyregion/no-texts-please-were-meditating.html?emc=eta1
 Increasing numbers of harried New Yorkers are gathering to close their eyes 
and just breathe.



 View on www.nytimes.com 
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/20/nyregion/no-texts-please-were-meditating.html?emc=eta1

 Preview by Yahoo 
 
  

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<dhamiltony2k5@... mailto:dhamiltony2k5@...> wrote :
 The Hidden Price of Mindfulness Inc. 
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/20/opinion/sunday/the-hidden-price-of-mindfulness-inc.html?emc=eta1&_r=0

 
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/20/opinion/sunday/the-hidden-price-of-mindfulness-inc.html?emc=eta1&_r=0
 The Hidden Price of Mindfulness Inc. 
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/20/opinion/sunday/the-hidden-price-of-mindfulness-inc.html?emc=eta1&_r=0
 As the practice of mindfulness is packaged and peddled, it’s hard not to 
wonder if something essential is being lost.



 View on www.nytimes.com 
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/20/opinion/sunday/the-hidden-price-of-mindfulness-inc.html?emc=eta1&_r=0

 Preview by Yahoo 
 
  

 With so many mindful goods and services for sale, it can be easy to forget 
that mindfulness is a quality of being, not a piece of merchandise.

  

  ..while purists sometimes wrung their hands about its commercialization, 
their lamentations were in vain. Let loose in the American marketplace, yoga 
took on a life of its own. Now, she said, the same thing is happening with 
mindfulness.

  

 ..Though this may result in less signal and more noise, it doesn’t mean 
mindfulness can’t still be beneficial. Yoga may have changed over the years, 
but plenty of authentic teachers and ashrams can still be found. The same 
dynamic will most likely play out with mindfulness, too. Strange variations on 
mindfulness will proliferate, while pockets of traditional teachings endure.

  

  

  http://nyti.ms/1XDaPnu 
http://p.nytimes.com/email/re?location=InCMR7g4BCKC2wiZPkcVUsb75Xk4dusI&user_id=325d185f131a5d67e0cba86c1a05b2bf&email_type=eta&task_id=1458498522242278&regi_id=0

  

  

  

  

  

  

  



  



  







  













  










 






 


 

















Reply via email to