"Mr. Trump may not be quite up on some key issues, but at least he’s not under investigation by the FBI for espionage and corruption."
Me, The Observer, and The Donald https://20committee.com/2016/06/02/me-the-observer-and-the-donald/ https://20committee.com/2016/06/02/me-the-observer-and-the-donald/ Me, The Observer, and The Donald https://20committee.com/2016/06/02/me-the-observer-and-the-donald/ Since last autumn I’ve been writing about national security for The Observer, the New York-based newspaper. It’s been a lot of fun and you can see all of my column... View on 20committee.com https://20committee.com/2016/06/02/me-the-observer-and-the-donald/ Preview by Yahoo ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote : Bull, Mike. Malicious falsehoods have always infuriated me. You know that perfectly well from having seen me go after Barry for his lies time after time, defending others as well as myself. Nobody should "laugh off" the drek the NRA is accusing Hillary of planning, because there are just too many stupid and gullible people who will believe it. The NRA tried the same thing with Obama, but it seems like he's just not going to get around to disarming the citizenry. Of course, that was never his intention, and it's not Hillary's intention either. Hillary can nominate anybody she wants to the Supreme Court, even people who want to "revise" the Second Amendment, if she can find any. What she won't be able to do is get them confirmed. (You are aware Supreme Court nominees have to be confirmed by the Senate, right?) Nobody who's suspected of wanting to disarm Americans via reinterpreting the Second Amendment has the slightest chance of Senate confirmation. And that includes many if not most Democratic senators. The president doesn't have carte blanche to pack the Supreme Ccourt. The Constitution mandates a balance of powers. The most the president can do, by very carefully picking nominees that can be confirmed, is nudge the Court a little bit in a liberal direction. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote : Judy, you wouldn't be so infuriated if it were not true. The fact that you so vigorously defend her here is enough proof. If it were *garbage*, you'd laugh it off and not even bother to comment. You know that if she were elected that she would start off with at least one Supreme Court nomination. One that could reshape the Court to take more liberal stands, thus reshaping America. Chances are that there may be two r three more after Scalia is replaced, while she would be in office. She would have the potential to affect the Supreme Court for decades by stacking it so far to the left that any leftist agenda could be passed or upheld. This is what is at stake in this election, the make up of the Supreme Court. This is why even Republicans that hate Trump with a passion will vote for him and they will all be there whether they will admit it or not. The idea of Hillary stacking the Supreme Court is absolutely horrifying. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, June 4, 2016 1:35 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: This is Eggzactly why Trump will be elected This is dishonest garbage, Mike. Not the first from you, but some of the worst. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote : C'mon Judy, you've been a die hard Hillary supporter for years. You're saying she couldn't do what I'm suggesting if she wanted? Of course she couldn't impose an outright ban on guns but... She couldn't name Supreme Court Justice candidates if she were elected? It's a vast, right-wing, conspiracy thing all over again? Are you still convinced that the FBI is not investigating *her* but only the security of her Server? C'mon Judy. You hold a crucifix up to Dracula's face and he cries out "Sacrilege"as he turns away from it ! You speak the obvious truth about Hillary and Judy freaks and denies it. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, June 4, 2016 12:25 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: This is Eggzactly why Trump will be elected You've gone right over the edge, Mike. I don't "know" any such thing, and I have no need to "cover" for her, because you're spouting the most amazing paranoid rubbish. She couldn't do what you're suggesting even if she wanted to. What you're pushing is a filthy, dangerous conspiracy by the NRA and gun manufacturers and dealers to frighten stupid, gullible people into buying more guns "before it's too late." Disgusting and shameful. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote : Not at all Judy and you know it. You're covering for her. She couldn't get elected if the average person knew that and you know that as well. It's no secret that the left wants American citizens disarmed. They keep trying to say that the second Amendment doesn't apply to citizens, that it applies to a *well regulated militia* that we don't need any more, that they were talking about muskets and muzzle loaders, not automatic and semi automatic weapons. They want us to be just like Europe and Australia. In fact they keep talking about how *more civilized* they are and they don't need guns.If you need protection, call a policeman. . They can't pass laws through legislation because nobody would vote for them, so they go the route of the courts.The problem they face is the Constitution and it's current interpretation by the majority of the Supreme Court. They want that changed to aid in creating a *gun free* society, like Europe and Australia. They use them as the standard. Hillary wouldn't stand a snowballs chance in Hell of being elected to anything if she ever openly advocating such nonsense. Democrats know the removal of gun rights must be done incrementally until they can stack the Supreme Court to completely re-interpret the Second Amendment to achieve their goals. Gun laws, as they stand, are rarely enforced to their max. They want more and more laws which they can then claim, just didn't get the job done.So we have to go the more drastic route of a total gun ban. Hey Ann... you want a total gun ban, don't you? From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, June 4, 2016 9:06 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: This is Eggzactly why Trump will be elected This is utter nonsense, Mike. It's malicious, deceptive NRA propaganda. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote : If Hillary is elected, she'll appoint Supreme Court judges that will redefine the Second Amendment of the Constitution that allows the people to be armed. We could end up totally disarmed at some point, and at the mercy of thugs, as they are in Europe. Maharishi used to say, "if your neighbor can't be quiet out of love and respect, let him be quiet out of fear."First Symposium on the Science of Creative Intelligence, Amherst Massachusetts, 1971. However, the context was in relationship to Nuclear arms and nations, but works on an individual level as well. From: "hepa7@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, June 4, 2016 6:11 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: This is Eggzactly why Trump will be elected Vote for Trump to avoid e.g. this? Most Teens Afraid Of Young Arabs http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/06/02/german-teen-afraid-young-arabs/ http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/06/02/german-teen-afraid-young-arabs/ Most Teens Afraid Of Young Arabs http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/06/02/german-teen-afraid-young-arabs/ A German teen claims that most youth are afraid of Arabs and talks about why many German men have given up defending themselves, opting to wait for police ins... View on www.breitbart.com http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/06/02/german-teen-afraid-young-arabs/ Preview by Yahoo
