The recommended procedure when looking for a guru is to test them for
some time before becoming a student. That can be months (in some cases
years).
On 07/26/2018 09:26 AM, [email protected] [FairfieldLife] wrote:
I am simply suggesting that some better levels of validation would be
useful when teachers make claims about their attainments and the
effectiveness of their methods to enable students to achieve the same.
If a teacher is not making such claims, then validation is not an issue.
Using Batgap interviews as a large sample of teachers, most are making
claims, at least implicitly, about their attainments and the
effectiveness of their teaching. So I think validation is a
legitimate issue in the larger non-dual community.
