--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- markmeredith2002 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > It's good that tmo scientists try to get published, > > but the spirit of > > the whole effort seems to fall more under PR than > > science - and until > > at least one independent scientist is impressed > > enough by the > > maharishi effect research to begin the long process > > of replication, > > then it's still an proven theory. > > More a very unusual hypothesis with some slight > empirical support. Not enough to build a theory on > becaue there is so much empirical evidence which > completely contradicts the M.A. "theory" as it is now > constructed. > >
Which emperical evidence contradicts the ME theory? ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
