Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ego in Enlightenment and Enlightened Ironies

[Vaj]

On Jan 8, 2006, at 1:31 PM, authfriend wrote: But when the person says there is no ego in enlightenment, perhaps they are speaking of the Self, what they now identify with.  The trick is to make it clear which--self or Self--is the referent in a particular statement.  If it's not made clear, confusion and apparent contradiction may result. Ken Wilber will use self, small "s" and Self, capital "S" or "ego" for ahamkara, and Transcendental Ego for Self or Atman. Also "ego" and "Ego". Nice way to make the distinction in English. Of course that's only if you believe or experience that there is an Atman.... To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' SPONSORED LINKS Maharishi university of management Maharishi mahesh yogi Ramana maharshi YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.