--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], doctor_gabby_savy > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], bhagwan_goose > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > My point exactly. As you may have seen in my original post > back > > > to > > > > > > peter (to which you responded) if procession does not imply > the > > > sun > > > > > > rising from different directions, for example from the west > > > 13,000 > > > > > > yrsr agos (half a precessional cycle), then why and how > does it > > > > > > make SV invalid in the long run -- as Peter has argued. > > > > > > > > > > I don't think your mental model is quite right, > > > > > > > > Not the first time its been off. :) > > > > > > > > > but I'm not sure exactly how it's off, so I don't > > > > > know how to help you correct it. > > > > > > > > Do you therefore feel Peter's model is correct? If so, can you > > > > explain why? > > > > > > Wasn't following that closely, sorry. > > > > > > > Haha. OK. But since my post was a refutation of Peter's post, its > hard > > to understand why you hold that my post is "off" if you don't > > understand his post. > > I didn't pay much attention to his post. You said your > mental image of precession wasn't clear; I tried to help > with that.
Yes. And I thank for that. But I am still seeking the visual model in my head that shows precession and its effects on the position of stars relative to earth (this is a major dif between jyotish and western astrology -- the latter not taking precession into account) and precession relative earth based directional orientations. Your "spinning top" is part, but not the complete model I am seeking. >But whatever precession has to do with proper > Vastu, it has *nothing* to do with the sun rising in the > west. And your view contradicts Peter's position. Thus, I was surprised that while you don't get Peter's position -- you view my position is off. Yet my position refutes Peter's. Anyway, see my adjacent post. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
