--- In [email protected], "anonyff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], doctor_gabby_savy > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], doctor_gabby_savy > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > > > >But whatever precession has to do with proper > > > > > > Vastu, it has *nothing* to do with the sun rising in the > > > > > > west. > > > > > > > > > > And your view contradicts Peter's position. > > > > > > > > I seriously doubt Peter was saying precession results > > > > in the sun eventually rising in the west. What's off > > > > about your mental model, I strongly suspect, is that > > > > you think what he's saying *implies* this; precession > > > > certainly does not. > > > > > > > > Whether precession throws proper Vastu off, I'm not > > > > sure; but if it does, it would be within a relatively > > > > small range--about 24 degrees--and only temporarily: > > > > every 26,000 years, approximately, the circle described > > > > by the earth's axis is complete, and it's back to its > > > > starting point. > > > > > > Ok. I may have not gotten the full picture of precession, the 24 > > > degree part. Ok, visualizing it, I think I get it. At 180 degrees of > > > precession, the relationship / tilt of the earth to sun is changed > > > by 24 degrees. > > > > Yes, I think that's right. > > > > > Yet during the 26000 year precesson cycle, the planets, including > > > the sun, "travel" the full 360 degrees of the zodiac. > > > > > > Thats the visual model I have not captured yet, to capture these two > > > things. > > > > See the link I posted in response to Vaj--that may help. > > I've got both models in mind, but I can't put them > > together. I don't believe the difference between the > > Tropical and Sidereal Zodiacs is at all related to Vastu, > > though, except insofar as the precession of the equinoxes > > is related to both the differences in the Zodiacs and > > to Vastu (and I'm not sure it's related to Vastu after > > all--see below). > > > > > Regardless, my quesion is the same -- but its just the "effect" is > > > less, about 12th. > > > > > > a) in 13000 years, does the sun rise 24 degrees off the point earth > > > it now rises (at same day of the year)? > > > > It's either 24 or 12 degrees. I *think* it's 24. > > > > > In other words, > > > > > > b) If a house is facing the sun properly now, will it be facing the > > > sun properly in 13000 years. > > > > See the message Rick just posted from somebody else. > > I think he's right, that due east is an earth-based > > direction and doesn't ever change no matter what > > the earth's axis does--which would mean Peter is wrong, > > but in a different way than you had thought. > > > > If Peter's right and Rick's poster is wrong, though, > > a house that's facing the sun properly now would be > > facing the sun properly again in *26,000* years, not > > 13,000. I think... Thirteen thousand years would be > > the maximum variance. > > > > > > > And for practical purposes, even if the correct orientation of the > > > sun does shift over time, its about 1 degree every 500 years. As I > > > remember SV tolerances are like 2 degrees. So a building is good to > > > go for 1000 years or so. > > > > Here's my 2 cents... East and West are determined by the spin of the > earth, not by the relationship of the earth and sun or stars. The > earth spins about the axis defined by the poles, and that doesn't > change - the north pole is always at the same place in the arctic, and > the south pole is always at the same place in the antarctic. So long > as the earth spins about that axis, the sun will always rise in the > east, but at a varying latitude as Vaj said. That higher or lower > latitude will change the length of the day, but it won't change which > way is east. If you use Vaj's stick and circle method for finding > which way is east, the latitude of the sun will determine the times at > which the shadow crosses the line, and the angle from the stick to the > crossing points, but when you join the points, the line will always be > parallel to the spin of the earth. > > The magnetic poles are another matter entirely. They are close to the > earths spin axis, but constantly slowly moving around, which is why > magnetic north, for most of us, is not the same as true north. Then > occasionally at random times, typically hundreds of thousands of years > apart, the magnetic poles switch over between the arctic and > antarctic. If you look at a compass after that happens it will > indicate that *magnetic* north is in the antarctic, so based on that > the sun will rise in the west, but that's only by the compass, and in > fact the sun will continue to rise in the same direction it always has. > > So you can build your east facing house, and it will stay facing east. > > Scorpianon - facing east and still not enlightened >
...but what happens when the universe implodes back into a point singularity? How will that influence the determination of East vs West, and what effect will that have on housing values? ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
