--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], MDixon6569@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 2/10/06 10:45:49 A.M. Central Standard Time, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > com writes: > > > > > > > The booing of Trent Lott was far from > > > > exaggerated, I saw it and heard it and it wasn't just a few. It > > > > was loud and rude. > > > > > > The sound was turned up on the clips to exaggerate it. > > > Those who were actually *there* at the rally are very > > > clear that it was just a few people. > > > > > > > > > > > > Nice try again Judy. I saw it live and it was shown on different > > stations > > > and they were all equally loud. If one turned up and distorted > > the volume to > > > sound like more, then they all did it, which is a little too > much > > for me to > > > believe. I guess all the sound techs for all the major stations > > could have been > > > republicans, part of the right wing conspiracy, who all > conspired > > to turn up > > > and distort the booing to make it sound really bad. > > > > > > > Probably due to the acoustics of the Church/Temple/meeting hall > > where the funeral was taking place. > > > > Reminds me of the State of the Union Address by Clinton during the > > Monica scandal. That was the one where there was serious > > discussion about not having Clinton appear (which would have been > > hard to do seeing that the State of the Union is a constitutional > > requirement) > > The Constitution does not require him to give > a speech to Congress, just for the record. On > the other hand, there wasn't any "serious > discussion" about not having him appear either. > > > due to the scandal. But he did speak...and because of the > acoustics > > of the House or Senate (not sure which is the one in which the > > president gives the address), even just one person cheering or > > clapping sounds like 20 people... > > > > And this went a long way towards Clinton saving his presidency > > because the impression it gave was that many, many people were > > cheering him regardless of the actual number who were because of > the > > acoustics. > > Nonsense. Clinton's ratings were way high already, > Monica or no Monica. >
This was right at the time that the scandal broke. Indeed, that Sunday on ABC's "This Week" Sam Donaldson predicted that Clinton would resign that week. Easy to say "nonsense" in hindsight. There was serious discussion that his presidency was over at the time. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
